No connection

Search Results

Comparison Score 15 Neutral

FSTA vs. PBJ: Evaluating Consumer Staples ETFs for Your Portfolio

Apr 02, 2026 16:30 UTC
FSTA, PBJ
Short term

The Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and the Invesco Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) offer distinct approaches to the consumer staples sector. This article compares their expense ratios, diversification, and performance to help investors decide which ETF aligns with their goals.

  • FSTA has a lower expense ratio (0.08%) compared to PBJ (0.61%).
  • FSTA offers a higher dividend yield (2.2%) than PBJ (1.5%).
  • FSTA holds 98 stocks, providing broader diversification than PBJ’s 31 holdings.
  • PBJ focuses on food and beverage companies, while FSTA includes household products, tobacco, and personal care.
  • FSTA’s top holdings include Walmart, Costco, and Procter & Gamble.
  • PBJ’s top holdings include Corteva, Kroger, and Archer-Daniels-Midland.

The Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and the Invesco Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) are two popular exchange-traded funds targeting the U.S. consumer staples sector. While both aim to provide exposure to this stable industry, their strategies, cost structures, and diversification levels differ significantly. FSTA, with a lower expense ratio of 0.08% compared to PBJ’s 0.61%, offers a more cost-effective option for long-term investors. Additionally, FSTA provides a higher dividend yield of 2.2% versus PBJ’s 1.5%, making it more attractive to income-focused investors. FSTA tracks a broad index of consumer staples stocks, holding 98 securities and offering exposure to a wide range of companies, including Walmart, Costco, and Procter & Gamble. This diversification reduces concentration risk and provides broader sector coverage. In contrast, PBJ focuses narrowly on food and beverage companies, with 31 holdings and a higher concentration in its top three positions, which account for over 15% of the portfolio. PBJ’s top holdings include Corteva, Kroger, and Archer-Daniels-Midland, reflecting its emphasis on agriculture and food production. While PBJ has recently outperformed FSTA in total return, FSTA has delivered better returns over the past five years. FSTA’s broader diversification and lower costs may provide a performance edge in a strengthening economy, particularly as consumer spending increases. Investors seeking a more diversified, cost-efficient option with a higher yield may find FSTA more appealing, while those focused on food and beverage companies might prefer PBJ’s specialized approach.

Sign up free to read the full analysis

Create a free account to unlock full AI-curated market articles, personalized alerts, and more.

Share this article

Related Articles

Stay Ahead of the Markets

Join thousands of traders using AI-powered market intelligence. Get personalized insights, real-time alerts, and advanced analysis tools.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile