No connection

Search Results

Commodities Score 25 Neutral

GDX and SGDM: A Tale of Two Gold Miner ETFs with $27 Billion in Assets Under Management

Apr 03, 2026 01:02 UTC
GDX, SGDM
Medium term

VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) both target gold mining companies but differ significantly in size, holdings, and risk profiles. This analysis highlights key distinctions for investors considering gold-focused strategies.

  • GDX has $28 billion in assets under management compared to SGDM's $660 million, creating a $27.34 billion size gap
  • GDX holds 57 gold mining companies while SGDM maintains a more concentrated portfolio of 39 stocks
  • Both funds share similar top holdings including Agnico Eagle, Newmont, and Barrick but differ in portfolio concentration
  • SGDM offers a modestly higher dividend yield compared to GDX
  • GDX's broader holdings provide exposure to mid-tier and smaller miners while SGDM's concentrated approach weights top holdings more heavily
  • The size difference becomes significant for larger trades, with GDX offering better liquidity and price efficiency

The VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) offer investors exposure to gold mining companies but diverge in several key aspects. GDX, with $28 billion in assets under management, dwarfs SGDM's $660 million, creating a $27.34 billion size gap between the two funds. Both funds focus on companies deriving most of their revenue from gold mining, but their portfolio structures differ significantly. GDX holds 57 companies, including major players like Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd (TSX:AEM.TO), Newmont Corp (NEM), and Barrick Mining Corp (TSX:ABX.TO). This broad approach has been in place for nearly two decades since the fund's launch. In contrast, SGDM maintains a more concentrated portfolio of 39 stocks, with the same top holdings but in different proportions. Both funds allocate entirely to the basic materials sector. The structural differences translate to distinct risk/reward profiles. GDX's larger size and broader holdings provide greater liquidity and exposure to mid-tier and smaller miners, which can add volatility but also capture growth opportunities. SGDM's concentrated approach gives its top holdings more weight while reducing exposure to smaller names. This tighter focus may offer a marginally smoother ride during market uncertainty. Costs for both funds are nearly identical, with SGDM having a slight edge on expense ratio. SGDM also offers a modestly higher dividend yield, which could appeal to income-focused investors. While the funds share similar sector tilts and top stocks, the differences in portfolio concentration and size become more pronounced during significant market movements. For most investors, the practical differences between these funds are modest in typical market conditions. However, the $27 billion size gap becomes relevant for larger trades, where GDX's scale provides advantages in liquidity and price efficiency. This distinction is particularly important for institutional investors or those with substantial positions in gold miner ETFs.

Sign up free to read the full analysis

Create a free account to unlock full AI-curated market articles, personalized alerts, and more.

Share this article

Stay Ahead of the Markets

Join thousands of traders using AI-powered market intelligence. Get personalized insights, real-time alerts, and advanced analysis tools.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile