AAME vs COHN
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
AAME's Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicates weak financial health, signaling potential operational inefficiencies and limited profitability sustainability. The absence of an Altman Z-Score raises concern about default risk, particularly given the company's small size and high leverage relative to peers. While the stock trades at a significant discount to its Graham Number ($5.27) and intrinsic value ($1.61), suggesting undervaluation, this is offset by stagnant earnings growth, poor technical momentum, and lack of analyst coverage. The 20.8% revenue growth is encouraging but unconfirmed by earnings data, and the 1Y return of +100.9% may reflect speculative momentum rather than fundamentals.
COHN presents a classic deep-value opportunity with a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicating stable financial health and a current price ($21.88) trading significantly below both its Graham Number ($53.43) and Intrinsic Value ($30.45). The company exhibits explosive revenue growth (493.40% YoY) and an exceptional ROE of 41.51%, though these are offset by high leverage (Debt/Equity 4.41). While technical trends and insider sentiment are currently bearish, the fundamental valuation gap and profitability metrics suggest significant upside potential.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
AAME vs COHN: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Atlantic American Corporation (AAME) and Cohen & Company Inc. (COHN) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.