No connection

Search Results

ACFN vs HOLO

ACFN
Acorn Energy, Inc.
BEARISH
Price
$19.04
Market Cap
$47.7M
Sector
Technology
AI Confidence
85%
HOLO
MicroCloud Hologram Inc.
BEARISH
Price
$1.89
Market Cap
$43.3M
Sector
Technology
AI Confidence
90%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
ACFN
7.16
HOLO
--
Forward P/E
ACFN
--
HOLO
--
P/B Ratio
ACFN
5.78
HOLO
0.11
P/S Ratio
ACFN
4.15
HOLO
0.11
EV/EBITDA
ACFN
21.09
HOLO
-940.6

Profitability

Gross Margin
ACFN
76.8%
HOLO
21.27%
Operating Margin
ACFN
11.74%
HOLO
0.79%
Profit Margin
ACFN
21.87%
HOLO
-13.06%
ROE
ACFN
36.62%
HOLO
-2.34%
ROA
ACFN
10.39%
HOLO
0.07%

Growth

Revenue Growth
ACFN
-32.6%
HOLO
51.0%
Earnings Growth
ACFN
-79.9%
HOLO
--

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
ACFN
0.13
HOLO
0.02
Current Ratio
ACFN
1.83
HOLO
33.55
Quick Ratio
ACFN
1.41
HOLO
33.47

Dividends

Dividend Yield
ACFN
--
HOLO
--
Payout Ratio
ACFN
0.0%
HOLO
0.0%

AI Verdict

ACFN BEARISH

ACFN's deterministic health scorecard reveals significant red flags: a weak Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 indicates deteriorating financial health, while the absence of an Altman Z-Score raises unquantified bankruptcy risk. Despite a high intrinsic value estimate of $18.62 and a Graham Number of $14.04, the stock trades at $19.04, reflecting a premium that is not justified by current fundamentals. The company exhibits severe revenue and earnings contraction (-32.6% and -79.9% YoY), with a history of large negative earnings surprises and inconsistent beat rates. Technical and insider signals are neutral to bearish, and analyst coverage is absent, underscoring a lack of institutional confidence.

Strengths
High gross margin (76.80%) indicates strong pricing power and cost control
Strong ROE (36.62%) suggests efficient use of equity capital
Low debt/equity ratio (0.13) implies conservative capital structure
Risks
Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 signals weak financial health and deteriorating operational efficiency
Severe revenue and earnings decline (-32.6% and -79.9% YoY) indicates fundamental business contraction
Historical earnings surprises averaging -83.08% over last 4 quarters reflect poor forecasting accuracy and earnings quality
HOLO BEARISH

The company presents a Piotroski F-Score of 5/9, indicating stable financial health, but this is heavily overshadowed by a catastrophic price collapse of -91.1% over the last year. While valuation metrics like Price/Book (0.11) and Price/Sales (0.11) suggest extreme undervaluation, the lack of an Altman Z-Score and Graham Number indicates insufficient or unreliable data for traditional defensive valuation. The combination of negative profit margins and a 0/100 technical trend suggests a classic value trap scenario.

Strengths
Strong revenue growth of 51% YoY
Extremely low Debt/Equity ratio (0.02)
Very high liquidity with a Current Ratio of 33.55
Risks
Severe price depreciation (-91.1% 1Y change)
Negative net profit margins (-13.06%)
Complete lack of analyst coverage and target price guidance

Compare Another Pair

ACFN vs HOLO: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Acorn Energy, Inc. (ACFN) and MicroCloud Hologram Inc. (HOLO) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile