No connection

Search Results

AERT vs HHS

AERT
Aeries Technology, Inc
BEARISH
Price
$0.41
Market Cap
$20.6M
Sector
Industrials
AI Confidence
92%
HHS
Harte Hanks, Inc.
BEARISH
Price
$2.36
Market Cap
$17.5M
Sector
Industrials
AI Confidence
95%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
AERT
--
HHS
--
Forward P/E
AERT
--
HHS
2.21
P/B Ratio
AERT
-17.09
HHS
0.85
P/S Ratio
AERT
0.3
HHS
0.11
EV/EBITDA
AERT
10.45
HHS
6.32

Profitability

Gross Margin
AERT
24.91%
HHS
17.32%
Operating Margin
AERT
4.42%
HHS
-0.4%
Profit Margin
AERT
-4.22%
HHS
-0.51%
ROE
AERT
--
HHS
-3.84%
ROA
AERT
2.93%
HHS
0.62%

Growth

Revenue Growth
AERT
-0.8%
HHS
-15.4%
Earnings Growth
AERT
-67.8%
HHS
--

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
AERT
--
HHS
1.09
Current Ratio
AERT
0.75
HHS
1.54
Quick Ratio
AERT
0.49
HHS
1.34

Dividends

Dividend Yield
AERT
--
HHS
--
Payout Ratio
AERT
0.0%
HHS
0.0%

AI Verdict

AERT BEARISH

AERT exhibits severe financial distress, as reflected in its Piotroski F-Score of 2/9, indicating weak operational and financial health. The absence of an Altman Z-Score and negative Price/Book ratio (-17.09) signal deep value distortion and potential insolvency risk. Despite a modest gross margin of 24.91%, the company reports negative profit margins (-4.22%) and declining revenue and earnings (YoY -0.80% and -67.80%, respectively). Insider selling of $0.06M over six months further undermines confidence, while the stock has lost over 95% of its value over five years. These factors collectively point to a high-risk, fundamentally deteriorating business.

Strengths
Gross margin of 24.91% indicates some pricing power or cost control in core operations
Operating margin of 4.42% suggests modest efficiency in core business activities
Price/Sales ratio of 0.30 implies deep discount relative to revenue, potentially attractive for value investors if fundamentals stabilize
Risks
Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 signals extreme financial weakness, including declining profitability and negative earnings growth
Negative Price/Book ratio (-17.09) implies market capitalization is below net asset value, which is unsustainable unless the company is bankrupt
Insider selling of 100,000 shares in six months indicates lack of confidence from leadership
HHS BEARISH

HHS exhibits severe financial distress, highlighted by a Piotroski F-Score of 0/9, indicating a total failure across all fundamental health benchmarks. The company is trapped in a cycle of contracting revenues (-15.40% YoY) and negative profitability, with a long-term price collapse of over 73% over three years. While the stock trades at a low Price-to-Book (0.85) and Price-to-Sales (0.11), these metrics appear to be a value trap rather than a discount, given the operational decay. The lack of analyst coverage and neutral insider activity further suggest a lack of institutional confidence.

Strengths
Price-to-Book ratio below 1.0 (0.85)
Extremely low Price-to-Sales ratio (0.11)
Current Ratio of 1.54 indicates short-term liquidity is currently maintained
Risks
Piotroski F-Score of 0/9 indicates critical fundamental weakness
Consistent revenue contraction (-15.40% YoY and -15.43% Q/Q)
Negative Return on Equity (-3.84%) and negative profit margins

Compare Another Pair

AERT vs HHS: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Aeries Technology, Inc (AERT) and Harte Hanks, Inc. (HHS) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile