ALTS vs IMMR
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
ALTS exhibits severe financial distress signals, with a Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 indicating poor operational and financial health. The company's Altman Z-Score is unavailable, but its negative ROA (-1.71%), negative operating margin (-218.34%), and extremely low current ratio (0.80) suggest high bankruptcy risk. Despite strong revenue growth (53.3% YoY), profitability remains elusive, and the stock trades at a steep Price/Sales of 6.85, far above its low Price/Book of 0.11. The 52-week price range ($1.08–$10.95) and 5-year decline of 82.8% reflect deep investor skepticism, despite a single 'strong_buy' analyst recommendation.
IMMR presents a classic 'deep value' paradox: it is fundamentally undervalued based on the Graham Number ($19.63) and Intrinsic Value ($13.3), yet it is plagued by a total collapse in technical momentum (0/100). The Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicates stable but mediocre financial health, while a negative operating margin (-8.03%) suggests that strong revenue growth (59.2%) is not yet translating into operational efficiency. While the dividend is exceptionally safe with a 7.11% payout ratio, the recent massive earnings miss (-382.1% surprise) and consistent price decline suggest a value trap until a catalyst emerges.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
ALTS vs IMMR: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares ALT5 Sigma Corporation (ALTS) and Immersion Corporation (IMMR) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.