AMG vs ZION
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
AMG exhibits strong financial health with a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9, indicating robust fundamentals across profitability, leverage, and operating efficiency. Despite the absence of an Altman Z-Score, the company shows low distress risk with a healthy Debt/Equity ratio of 0.56 and exceptional liquidity (Current Ratio: 126.47). The stock trades above the Graham Number ($207.58) but below the growth-based intrinsic value ($478.2), supported by strong earnings growth (YoY EPS +81.8%) and analyst target consensus of $364.14. However, weak insider sentiment and minimal dividend yield temper near-term catalysts.
ZION presents a stark contrast between deep valuation discounts and deteriorating fundamental health, highlighted by a weak Piotroski F-Score of 2/9. While the stock trades significantly below its Graham Number ($83.55) and Intrinsic Value ($189.98), the low health score and bearish insider sentiment suggest underlying operational risks. Strong year-over-year earnings growth of 38.10% provides a bullish catalyst, but this is offset by a high PEG ratio of 4.29 and a very bearish technical trend. The overall outlook is neutral as the valuation margin of safety battles fundamental fragility.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
AMG vs ZION: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (AMG) and Zions Bancorporation, National Association (ZION) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.