AMN vs FTRE
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
The company exhibits severe financial distress with a Piotroski F-Score of just 2/9, indicating weak fundamental health. Despite recent earnings surprises and short-term EPS growth, the business is unprofitable (negative profit margin and ROE), leveraged (Debt/Equity of 1.37), and has declining revenues. Valuation metrics like a high Forward P/E of 30.31 and low Price/Sales of 0.29 reflect inconsistent pricing signals, while the stock has lost over 70% of its value in the past five years. The absence of an Altman Z-Score due to insufficient data further raises concerns about financial stability.
FTRE exhibits severe fundamental weakness, highlighted by a critical Piotroski F-Score of 2/9, indicating poor financial health and operational deterioration. While valuation metrics like Price/Sales (0.32) and PEG (0.34) suggest the stock is deeply undervalued, this is offset by negative revenue growth (-5.20%), a negative ROE of -102.41%, and a current ratio below 1.0 (0.98), signaling liquidity risks. Despite a 'Buy' consensus from analysts with a target of $13.21, the combination of C-suite insider selling and a consistent failure to meet earnings estimates suggests a high-risk profile.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
AMN vs FTRE: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. (AMN) and Fortrea Holdings Inc. (FTRE) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.