No connection

Search Results

AMN vs OMDA

AMN
AMN Healthcare Services, Inc.
BEARISH
Price
$20.49
Market Cap
$787.1M
Sector
Healthcare
AI Confidence
78%
OMDA
Omada Health, Inc.
BEARISH
Price
$13.12
Market Cap
$773.1M
Sector
Healthcare
AI Confidence
85%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
AMN
--
OMDA
--
Forward P/E
AMN
30.31
OMDA
36.59
P/B Ratio
AMN
1.22
OMDA
3.34
P/S Ratio
AMN
0.29
OMDA
2.97
EV/EBITDA
AMN
7.87
OMDA
-84.98

Profitability

Gross Margin
AMN
29.37%
OMDA
65.69%
Operating Margin
AMN
1.33%
OMDA
4.33%
Profit Margin
AMN
-10.14%
OMDA
-4.91%
ROE
AMN
-35.9%
OMDA
-8.68%
ROA
AMN
1.17%
OMDA
-3.28%

Growth

Revenue Growth
AMN
-7.7%
OMDA
58.1%
Earnings Growth
AMN
321.3%
OMDA
--

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
AMN
1.37
OMDA
--
Current Ratio
AMN
1.05
OMDA
3.6
Quick Ratio
AMN
0.94
OMDA
3.4

Dividends

Dividend Yield
AMN
--
OMDA
--
Payout Ratio
AMN
0.0%
OMDA
0.0%

AI Verdict

AMN BEARISH

The company exhibits severe financial distress with a Piotroski F-Score of just 2/9, indicating weak fundamental health. Despite recent earnings surprises and short-term EPS growth, the business is unprofitable (negative profit margin and ROE), leveraged (Debt/Equity of 1.37), and has declining revenues. Valuation metrics like a high Forward P/E of 30.31 and low Price/Sales of 0.29 reflect inconsistent pricing signals, while the stock has lost over 70% of its value in the past five years. The absence of an Altman Z-Score due to insufficient data further raises concerns about financial stability.

Strengths
Consistently beats earnings estimates with an average surprise of over 90% in the last four quarters
Recent quarterly EPS growth (Q/Q) of +30.0% shows potential operational improvement
Operating margin remains positive at 1.33% despite overall net losses
Risks
Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 signals severe financial weakness and high risk of continued deterioration
Negative profit margin (-10.14%) and ROE (-35.90%) indicate persistent unprofitability and poor capital efficiency
Revenue declining YoY by 7.70%, reflecting shrinking top-line and potential market share loss
OMDA BEARISH

OMDA exhibits a critical disconnect between high revenue growth and deteriorating financial health, evidenced by a weak Piotroski F-Score of 2/9. While the company shows strong top-line expansion (58.1% YoY) and positive earnings surprises, the technical trend is completely bearish and insider sentiment is heavily negative. The high current ratio provides a liquidity cushion, but the aggressive selling by the CEO and other executives suggests a lack of internal confidence in the current valuation. Despite analyst 'Buy' recommendations and a higher target price, the fundamental health and price action indicate significant risk.

Strengths
Strong revenue growth of 58.10% YoY
High gross margins at 65.69%
Strong short-term liquidity with a current ratio of 3.60
Risks
Very weak Piotroski F-Score (2/9) indicating poor fundamental health
Heavy insider selling, specifically by the CEO and CFO
Severe price depreciation (-48.4% over the last 6 months)

Compare Another Pair

AMN vs OMDA: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. (AMN) and Omada Health, Inc. (OMDA) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI Chat
Markets
Profile