AOS vs IESC
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
AOS exhibits mixed financial health with a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, indicating borderline stability, and lacks an Altman Z-Score for distress risk assessment. Despite solid profitability metrics like a 28.21% ROE and 18.63% operating margin, the company faces headwinds from declining Q/Q EPS growth (-12.1%) and bearish insider activity. Valuation is stretched relative to Graham's defensive standard ($33.12) but aligns with growth-based intrinsic value ($106.35), while trading below analyst target ($78.27). The stock shows resilience in earnings beats over time, though recent deceleration and technical bearishness temper optimism.
IESC exhibits strong fundamental health with a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and an exceptionally low Debt/Equity ratio of 0.07. While the company demonstrates elite profitability (ROE 41.74%) and robust earnings growth (65.8% YoY), the stock is currently trading at a premium, exceeding both its Intrinsic Value ($496.78) and the analyst target price ($458.00). The divergence between stellar operational performance and bearish insider sentiment/technical trends suggests the stock may be overextended after its massive 1-year run (+194.9%).
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
AOS vs IESC: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS) and IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.