AP vs BYRN
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
AP's deterministic health scores signal significant financial distress: the Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 indicates weak operational and financial health, while the absence of an Altman Z-Score raises red flags for potential bankruptcy risk. Despite a strong 12.3% YoY revenue growth and recent earnings surprises, the company reports negative net profit margins (-1.24%) and ROE (-4.08%), with a dangerously high debt/equity ratio of 1.88. The stock trades at a premium valuation (Forward P/E: 28.83, Price/Book: 2.23) despite poor profitability and no dividend, suggesting overvaluation. Technical trends are bearish, and insider activity is neutral, offering no conviction.
BYRN exhibits severe fundamental deterioration, highlighted by a weak Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 and a significant divergence between analyst targets and market reality. While the company maintains a strong liquidity position with a current ratio of 4.96 and negligible debt, earnings growth has collapsed by 57.10% YoY. The stock is currently trading above both its Graham Number ($4.87) and Intrinsic Value ($2.52), suggesting it remains overvalued despite the massive price correction. The extreme bearish technical trend and crashing earnings outweigh the optimistic 'Strong Buy' analyst consensus.
Compare Another Pair
AP vs BYRN: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (AP) and Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.