No connection

Search Results

AZZ vs BETA

AZZ
AZZ Inc.
NEUTRAL
Price
$123.60
Market Cap
$3.72B
Sector
Industrials
AI Confidence
72%
BETA
BETA Technologies, Inc.
BEARISH
Price
$15.36
Market Cap
$3.66B
Sector
Industrials
AI Confidence
85%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
AZZ
11.84
BETA
--
Forward P/E
AZZ
18.17
BETA
-6.24
P/B Ratio
AZZ
2.8
BETA
1.94
P/S Ratio
AZZ
2.3
BETA
102.75
EV/EBITDA
AZZ
12.28
BETA
-5.77

Profitability

Gross Margin
AZZ
24.12%
BETA
72.2%
Operating Margin
AZZ
16.32%
BETA
-1210.42%
Profit Margin
AZZ
19.89%
BETA
0.0%
ROE
AZZ
27.38%
BETA
-66.19%
ROA
AZZ
7.23%
BETA
-16.8%

Growth

Revenue Growth
AZZ
5.5%
BETA
150.9%
Earnings Growth
AZZ
21.4%
BETA
--

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
AZZ
0.43
BETA
0.11
Current Ratio
AZZ
1.66
BETA
22.77
Quick Ratio
AZZ
1.18
BETA
22.46

Dividends

Dividend Yield
AZZ
0.61%
BETA
--
Payout Ratio
AZZ
6.95%
BETA
0.0%

AI Verdict

AZZ NEUTRAL

AZZ has a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, indicating marginal financial health, and lacks an Altman Z-Score for distress risk assessment. Despite strong profitability metrics like a 27.38% ROE and solid earnings growth, recent insider selling and declining EPS trends raise caution. The stock trades below the analyst target price but at a significant premium to the conservative Graham Number of $101.88, while forward P/E expansion suggests growth expectations are already priced in. Mixed signals from strong historical returns and solid margins against weakening recent earnings momentum result in a neutral stance.

Strengths
High return on equity (27.38%) well above sector average (5.96%)
Strong operating and profit margins (16.32% and 19.89%) compared to peers
Low debt/equity ratio of 0.43, indicating conservative capital structure
Risks
Weak Piotroski F-Score of 4 suggests deteriorating financial health
Negative YoY and Q/Q EPS growth trends (-2.2% and -12.3%) despite prior momentum
Insider selling activity totaling $2.02M in last 6 months signals lack of confidence
BETA BEARISH

BETA Technologies exhibits weak financial health per the Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, indicating a fragile operational foundation despite strong revenue growth. The company's profitability metrics are severely impaired, with a negative operating margin of -1210.42% and a negative ROE of -66.19%, signaling deep operational inefficiencies. Although the firm shows robust revenue growth (150.90% YoY) and a high gross margin (72.20%), these are not translating into earnings or cash flow. The absence of a Graham Number and intrinsic value, combined with a forward P/E of -6.24, reflects a market pricing premium based on speculative growth rather than fundamentals. The lack of analyst consensus on target price and neutral insider activity further undermine conviction.

Strengths
Exceptional revenue growth of 150.90% YoY, indicating strong market demand or expansion
High gross margin of 72.20% suggests strong pricing power or efficient production
Favorable debt-to-equity ratio of 0.11, indicating low financial leverage
Risks
Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicates weak financial health and operational instability
Negative operating margin (-1210.42%) and ROE (-66.19%) signal severe profitability issues
Forward P/E of -6.24 and lack of earnings data suggest no current profitability

Compare Another Pair

AZZ vs BETA: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares AZZ Inc. (AZZ) and BETA Technologies, Inc. (BETA) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI Chat
Markets
Profile