AZZ vs HAYW
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
AZZ has a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, indicating marginal financial health, and lacks an Altman Z-Score for distress risk assessment. Despite strong profitability metrics like a 27.38% ROE and solid earnings growth, recent insider selling and declining EPS trends raise caution. The stock trades below the analyst target price but at a significant premium to the conservative Graham Number of $101.88, while forward P/E expansion suggests growth expectations are already priced in. Mixed signals from strong historical returns and solid margins against weakening recent earnings momentum result in a neutral stance.
HAYW exhibits strong fundamental health with a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and a robust liquidity profile (Current Ratio 2.94). While the current price of $15.79 is above the Graham Number ($10.59), it remains well below the growth-based intrinsic value of $20.06. The company demonstrates exceptional earnings consistency, beating estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters with strong operating margins of 25.02%. However, bullish fundamentals are currently offset by bearish insider activity and technical trends.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
AZZ vs HAYW: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares AZZ Inc. (AZZ) and Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.