No connection

Search Results

BDL vs CATO

BDL
Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc.
BULLISH
Price
$30.60
Market Cap
$56.9M
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
75%
CATO
The Cato Corporation
BEARISH
Price
$2.89
Market Cap
$56.9M
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
90%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BDL
9.84
CATO
--
Forward P/E
BDL
--
CATO
2.22
P/B Ratio
BDL
0.86
CATO
0.35
P/S Ratio
BDL
0.27
CATO
0.09
EV/EBITDA
BDL
6.3
CATO
-30.62

Profitability

Gross Margin
BDL
23.26%
CATO
33.75%
Operating Margin
BDL
2.92%
CATO
-9.05%
Profit Margin
BDL
2.77%
CATO
-0.9%
ROE
BDL
11.43%
CATO
-3.7%
ROA
BDL
4.39%
CATO
-2.01%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BDL
5.1%
CATO
-4.0%
Earnings Growth
BDL
1363.7%
CATO
--

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BDL
0.58
CATO
0.96
Current Ratio
BDL
1.65
CATO
1.24
Quick Ratio
BDL
1.22
CATO
0.64

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BDL
1.8%
CATO
--
Payout Ratio
BDL
17.68%
CATO
0.0%

AI Verdict

BDL BULLISH

BDL presents a classic deep-value opportunity, trading significantly below its Graham Number ($49.83) and Intrinsic Value ($91.74). While the Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicates stable but not strong financial health, the company maintains a conservative debt-to-equity ratio (0.58) and healthy liquidity. The valuation is exceptionally attractive with a P/E of 9.84 and a Price/Book of 0.86, especially when compared to the Consumer Cyclical sector average P/E of 33.90. Despite a bearish technical trend and slow revenue growth, the fundamental floor is well-supported by assets and earnings.

Strengths
Significant undervaluation relative to Graham Number and Intrinsic Value
Trading below book value (P/B 0.86)
Low P/E ratio (9.84) compared to sector average (33.90)
Risks
Strongly bearish technical trend (0/100)
Low net profit margins (2.77%) leaving little room for error
Sluggish organic revenue growth (5.10% YoY)
CATO BEARISH

CATO exhibits severe financial distress, highlighted by a critical Piotroski F-Score of 1/9, indicating a near-total failure of fundamental health metrics. While the stock appears superficially cheap with a Price/Book of 0.35 and Price/Sales of 0.09, these are classic 'value trap' indicators given the negative operating margins and declining revenue growth. The combination of a 0/100 technical trend and a -72.8% five-year price collapse suggests a company in structural decline. Without a significant operational turnaround, the current valuation does not provide a sufficient margin of safety.

Strengths
Extremely low Price-to-Sales ratio (0.09)
Trading significantly below book value (P/B 0.35)
Positive gross margin (33.75%)
Risks
Critical financial health (Piotroski F-Score 1/9)
Negative operating margins (-9.05%) and negative ROE
Consistent revenue decline (YoY -4.00%)

Compare Another Pair

BDL vs CATO: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. (BDL) and The Cato Corporation (CATO) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI Chat
Markets
Profile