No connection

Search Results

BKH vs CIG

BKH
Black Hills Corporation
NEUTRAL
Price
$71.68
Market Cap
$5.41B
Sector
Utilities
AI Confidence
75%
CIG
Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais - CEMIG
NEUTRAL
Price
$2.58
Market Cap
$7.38B
Sector
Utilities
AI Confidence
85%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BKH
18.1
CIG
7.37
Forward P/E
BKH
16.5
CIG
17.2
P/B Ratio
BKH
1.44
CIG
1.29
P/S Ratio
BKH
2.38
CIG
0.17
EV/EBITDA
BKH
12.25
CIG
3.14

Profitability

Gross Margin
BKH
38.54%
CIG
12.5%
Operating Margin
BKH
18.29%
CIG
20.07%
Profit Margin
BKH
12.53%
CIG
11.46%
ROE
BKH
7.92%
CIG
17.51%
ROA
BKH
3.28%
CIG
6.29%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BKH
7.1%
CIG
2.9%
Earnings Growth
BKH
-1.8%
CIG
88.1%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BKH
1.14
CIG
0.7
Current Ratio
BKH
0.91
CIG
1.0
Quick Ratio
BKH
0.4
CIG
0.78

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BKH
3.74%
CIG
5.91%
Payout Ratio
BKH
67.63%
CIG
96.83%

AI Verdict

BKH NEUTRAL

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard shows a Piotroski F-Score of 6/9, indicating stable financial health, but the absence of an Altman Z-Score limits distress risk assessment. The stock trades above the Graham defensive fair value of $66.70 at $71.68, supported by a forward P/E below sector average and solid dividend yield of 3.74%. Profitability metrics are healthy with strong gross and operating margins, though ROE and ROA are modest. Earnings growth has rebounded recently, but insider selling and weak technical trend signal caution despite analyst buy recommendation.

Strengths
Piotroski F-Score of 6 indicates stable financial health with balanced performance across profitability, leverage, and operating efficiency
Dividend yield of 3.74% is attractive relative to sector and broader market, supported by a manageable 67.63% payout ratio
Profitability margins are strong: gross margin at 38.54%, operating margin at 18.29%, and profit margin at 12.53%, all above sector averages
Risks
Current ratio of 0.91 and quick ratio of 0.40 indicate potential short-term liquidity pressure
Debt/Equity of 1.14 is moderate but elevated for a utility, especially with no Altman Z-Score to assess bankruptcy risk
Insider activity is bearish: CFO sold $1.03M in shares with no offsetting buys in last 6 months
CIG NEUTRAL

CIG presents a classic 'value trap' profile, characterized by a weak Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 indicating deteriorating financial health despite trading significantly below its Graham Number ($3.96) and Intrinsic Value ($10.32). While the current P/E of 7.37 is attractive, the Forward P/E of 17.20 suggests a projected collapse in earnings. Furthermore, a dividend payout ratio of 96.83% is unsustainable and poses a high risk of cuts. The disconnect between deep value metrics and poor fundamental health/analyst 'underperform' ratings warrants a neutral stance.

Strengths
Deeply undervalued relative to Graham Number ($3.96) and Intrinsic Value ($10.32)
Strong Return on Equity (ROE) of 17.51%
Low Price-to-Sales ratio (0.17) indicating high revenue relative to market cap
Risks
Weak financial health as evidenced by a Piotroski F-Score of 3/9
Unsustainable dividend payout ratio (96.83%)
Significant projected earnings decline (Forward P/E is 2.3x higher than current P/E)

Compare Another Pair

BKH vs CIG: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Black Hills Corporation (BKH) and Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais - CEMIG (CIG) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI Chat
Markets
Profile