No connection

Search Results

BLIN vs FTFT

BLIN
Bridgeline Digital, Inc.
BEARISH
Price
$0.82
Market Cap
$10.0M
Sector
Technology
AI Confidence
85%
FTFT
Future FinTech Group Inc.
BEARISH
Price
$1.72
Market Cap
$9.0M
Sector
Technology
AI Confidence
95%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BLIN
--
FTFT
--
Forward P/E
BLIN
6.83
FTFT
--
P/B Ratio
BLIN
1.05
FTFT
0.2
P/S Ratio
BLIN
0.65
FTFT
2.35
EV/EBITDA
BLIN
-5.93
FTFT
0.63

Profitability

Gross Margin
BLIN
66.57%
FTFT
10.66%
Operating Margin
BLIN
-11.78%
FTFT
40.56%
Profit Margin
BLIN
-16.37%
FTFT
-120.63%
ROE
BLIN
-25.48%
FTFT
-109.44%
ROA
BLIN
-9.32%
FTFT
-47.89%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BLIN
0.2%
FTFT
868.2%
Earnings Growth
BLIN
--
FTFT
--

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BLIN
0.05
FTFT
0.06
Current Ratio
BLIN
0.7
FTFT
6.18
Quick Ratio
BLIN
0.64
FTFT
5.4

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BLIN
--
FTFT
--
Payout Ratio
BLIN
0.0%
FTFT
0.0%

AI Verdict

BLIN BEARISH

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a deeply concerning financial profile with a Piotroski F-Score of just 1/9, indicating severe weakness in fundamental health. Despite a low Price/Sales and Price/Book ratio suggesting possible value, persistent unprofitability, negative ROE and ROA, and a deteriorating technical trend paint a picture of a company in distress. While the Forward P/E of 6.84 and analyst target price of $4.62 imply strong growth expectations, these are not supported by consistent revenue or earnings growth. The stock's multi-year price decline, including a 55.4% drop over the past year, reflects eroding investor confidence amid unreliable earnings delivery and weak cash flow visibility.

Strengths
Low valuation multiples: Price/Sales of 0.65 and Price/Book of 1.05 suggest potential undervaluation relative to book and sales base
High gross margin of 66.57% indicates strong pricing power or low cost of goods sold in its software business
Minimal leverage with Debt/Equity ratio of only 0.05 reduces default risk from debt obligations
Risks
Critically low Piotroski F-Score of 1/9 signals severe financial distress and poor fundamental health
Negative profitability across all metrics: -16.37% profit margin and -25.48% ROE indicate ongoing losses and inefficient capital use
Current ratio of 0.70 and quick ratio of 0.64 suggest near-term liquidity risk and inability to meet short-term obligations
FTFT BEARISH

FTFT exhibits critical financial distress, highlighted by a Piotroski F-Score of 1/9, indicating severe weakness across nearly all fundamental health dimensions. While the company shows explosive YoY revenue growth of 868.20%, this is offset by a catastrophic profit margin of -120.63% and an ROE of -109.44%, suggesting that growth is being achieved at an unsustainable cost. The long-term price trajectory is devastating, with a 5-year decline of 99.8%, and the recent short-term spike appears to be speculative rather than fundamental. The absence of current analyst coverage and the presence of stale earnings data further increase the risk profile.

Strengths
Exceptional YoY revenue growth of 868.20%
Very low Debt/Equity ratio (0.06)
Strong short-term liquidity with a Current Ratio of 6.18
Risks
Critical financial health (Piotroski F-Score 1/9)
Severe operational losses (Profit Margin -120.63%)
Extreme long-term capital erosion (-99.8% 5Y change)

Compare Another Pair

BLIN vs FTFT: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Bridgeline Digital, Inc. (BLIN) and Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile