No connection

Search Results

BLIN vs LEDS

BLIN
Bridgeline Digital, Inc.
BEARISH
Price
$0.82
Market Cap
$10.0M
Sector
Technology
AI Confidence
85%
LEDS
SemiLEDs Corporation
BEARISH
Price
$1.28
Market Cap
$10.5M
Sector
Technology
AI Confidence
95%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BLIN
--
LEDS
--
Forward P/E
BLIN
6.83
LEDS
--
P/B Ratio
BLIN
1.05
LEDS
5.08
P/S Ratio
BLIN
0.65
LEDS
0.24
EV/EBITDA
BLIN
-5.93
LEDS
-8.32

Profitability

Gross Margin
BLIN
66.57%
LEDS
4.94%
Operating Margin
BLIN
-11.78%
LEDS
-40.52%
Profit Margin
BLIN
-16.37%
LEDS
-2.99%
ROE
BLIN
-25.48%
LEDS
-72.62%
ROA
BLIN
-9.32%
LEDS
-10.04%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BLIN
0.2%
LEDS
103.7%
Earnings Growth
BLIN
--
LEDS
--

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BLIN
0.05
LEDS
1.28
Current Ratio
BLIN
0.7
LEDS
0.94
Quick Ratio
BLIN
0.64
LEDS
0.44

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BLIN
--
LEDS
--
Payout Ratio
BLIN
0.0%
LEDS
0.0%

AI Verdict

BLIN BEARISH

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a deeply concerning financial profile with a Piotroski F-Score of just 1/9, indicating severe weakness in fundamental health. Despite a low Price/Sales and Price/Book ratio suggesting possible value, persistent unprofitability, negative ROE and ROA, and a deteriorating technical trend paint a picture of a company in distress. While the Forward P/E of 6.84 and analyst target price of $4.62 imply strong growth expectations, these are not supported by consistent revenue or earnings growth. The stock's multi-year price decline, including a 55.4% drop over the past year, reflects eroding investor confidence amid unreliable earnings delivery and weak cash flow visibility.

Strengths
Low valuation multiples: Price/Sales of 0.65 and Price/Book of 1.05 suggest potential undervaluation relative to book and sales base
High gross margin of 66.57% indicates strong pricing power or low cost of goods sold in its software business
Minimal leverage with Debt/Equity ratio of only 0.05 reduces default risk from debt obligations
Risks
Critically low Piotroski F-Score of 1/9 signals severe financial distress and poor fundamental health
Negative profitability across all metrics: -16.37% profit margin and -25.48% ROE indicate ongoing losses and inefficient capital use
Current ratio of 0.70 and quick ratio of 0.64 suggest near-term liquidity risk and inability to meet short-term obligations
LEDS BEARISH

The deterministic health profile is critically weak, headlined by a Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 and a total absence of a Graham Number due to negative earnings. While the company shows an anomalous surge in revenue growth (103.7%), this has failed to translate into profitability, as evidenced by a devastating ROE of -72.62% and an operating margin of -40.52%. Liquidity is a primary concern with a Quick Ratio of 0.44, suggesting a high risk of insolvency. Combined with a 0/100 technical trend and a consistent multi-year history of losses, the stock exhibits classic characteristics of a value trap.

Strengths
Exceptional year-over-year revenue growth (103.70%)
Very low Price-to-Sales ratio (0.24)
Recent trend of beating quarterly earnings estimates
Risks
Severe liquidity crisis indicated by Quick Ratio of 0.44
Chronic unprofitability with negative operating margins (-40.52%)
Weak financial health (Piotroski F-Score 3/9)

Compare Another Pair

BLIN vs LEDS: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Bridgeline Digital, Inc. (BLIN) and SemiLEDs Corporation (LEDS) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile