No connection

Search Results

BLLN vs LQDA

BLLN
BillionToOne, Inc.
BEARISH
Price
$74.08
Market Cap
$3.41B
Sector
Healthcare
AI Confidence
85%
LQDA
Liquidia Corporation
NEUTRAL
Price
$38.85
Market Cap
$3.42B
Sector
Healthcare
AI Confidence
75%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BLLN
569.85
LQDA
--
Forward P/E
BLLN
82.77
LQDA
7.42
P/B Ratio
BLLN
7.07
LQDA
75.73
P/S Ratio
BLLN
11.16
LQDA
21.62
EV/EBITDA
BLLN
131.6
LQDA
-68.03

Profitability

Gross Margin
BLLN
68.32%
LQDA
91.64%
Operating Margin
BLLN
10.76%
LQDA
21.5%
Profit Margin
BLLN
0.96%
LQDA
-43.54%
ROE
BLLN
2.3%
LQDA
-111.05%
ROA
BLLN
2.14%
LQDA
-11.5%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BLLN
113.1%
LQDA
3054.6%
Earnings Growth
BLLN
--
LQDA
--

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BLLN
0.23
LQDA
4.42
Current Ratio
BLLN
11.69
LQDA
2.01
Quick Ratio
BLLN
11.21
LQDA
1.8

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BLLN
--
LQDA
--
Payout Ratio
BLLN
0.0%
LQDA
0.0%

AI Verdict

BLLN BEARISH

BLLN exhibits strong deterministic health with a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9, indicating solid operational efficiency and financial stability, though the absence of an Altman Z-Score raises concern about bankruptcy risk. The stock trades at a steep valuation, with a P/E of 569.85 and Price/Sales of 11.16, far exceeding sector averages and the Graham Number of $5.54, suggesting significant overvaluation. Despite explosive revenue growth of 113.1% YoY, earnings remain weak (Profit Margin 0.96%) and inconsistent, with a recent -83.5% Q/Q EPS decline and mixed earnings surprises. Insider activity is neutral with no recent trades, and technical momentum is bearish, reflecting prolonged underperformance. The combination of extreme valuation, deteriorating earnings quality, and lack of dividend support undermines long-term conviction.

Strengths
Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 indicates strong financial health and operational efficiency
Exceptional revenue growth of 113.1% YoY, outpacing sector average of 125.63%
High gross margin of 68.32% reflects strong pricing power and cost control
Risks
Extremely high P/E ratio of 569.85 and Price/Sales of 11.16 suggest severe overvaluation
Negative earnings trend with -83.5% Q/Q EPS growth and inconsistent earnings surprises
Graham Number ($5.54) is far below current price ($74.08), indicating deep undervaluation of intrinsic worth
LQDA NEUTRAL

Liquidia Corporation presents a high-risk, high-reward profile characterized by a critical Piotroski F-Score of 1/9, indicating severe fundamental weakness. While the company has achieved explosive revenue growth (3054.60% YoY) and maintains a strong gross margin of 91.64%, its balance sheet is distressed with a Debt/Equity ratio of 4.42 and an ROE of -111.05%. The market is pricing in significant future success, as evidenced by a Price/Book ratio of 75.73, though insider selling and a bearish technical trend suggest a potential near-term peak. The disconnect between analyst optimism (Buy rating) and deterministic health scores necessitates a neutral stance.

Strengths
Explosive revenue growth of 3054.60% YoY
Exceptional gross margins (91.64%) typical of high-value specialty drugs
Positive operating margin (21.50%) suggesting core business viability
Risks
Critical fundamental health (Piotroski F-Score 1/9)
Extreme valuation premiums (Price/Book 75.73, Price/Sales 21.62)
High leverage with a Debt/Equity ratio of 4.42

Compare Another Pair

BLLN vs LQDA: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares BillionToOne, Inc. (BLLN) and Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile