BMI vs MSFT
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard shows a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, indicating marginal financial health, and the absence of an Altman Z-Score prevents a full solvency risk assessment. Despite solid profitability metrics like 21.45% ROE and 19.57% operating margin, elevated valuation (P/E of 36.77 vs. sector average of 84.87) and bearish technical trend (0/100) offset strength in fundamentals. Revenue and earnings growth remain positive at 13.1% and 10.2% YoY, but recent price performance is sharply negative (-22% over 1Y), and analyst target suggests upside to $211.30. The stock trades well above the Graham Number of $49.73, reflecting premium pricing for growth expectations despite mixed earnings surprise trends.
Microsoft exhibits strong fundamental health with a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9, indicating robust financial stability. While the stock is currently experiencing a severe technical downtrend (0/100) and significant 6-month price depreciation (-28.6%), the current price of $374.33 sits well below the growth-based intrinsic value of $471.41 and the analyst target of $587.31. Exceptional earnings growth (59.8% YoY) and high operating margins (47.09%) suggest that the current price correction presents a value opportunity despite bearish insider sentiment.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
BMI vs MSFT: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.