No connection

Search Results

BNC vs TWIN

BNC
CEA Industries Inc.
BEARISH
Price
$5.52
Market Cap
$243.2M
Sector
Industrials
AI Confidence
65%
TWIN
Twin Disc, Incorporated
BULLISH
Price
$17.78
Market Cap
$256.4M
Sector
Industrials
AI Confidence
75%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BNC
--
TWIN
11.7
Forward P/E
BNC
1.17
TWIN
15.6
P/B Ratio
BNC
0.52
TWIN
1.39
P/S Ratio
BNC
65.36
TWIN
--
EV/EBITDA
BNC
2.76
TWIN
12.21

Profitability

Gross Margin
BNC
-32.84%
TWIN
27.87%
Operating Margin
BNC
1257.16%
TWIN
1.53%
Profit Margin
BNC
7327.84%
TWIN
6.26%
ROE
BNC
--
TWIN
13.3%
ROA
BNC
--
TWIN
1.84%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BNC
-3.9%
TWIN
0.3%
Earnings Growth
BNC
--
TWIN
2239.0%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BNC
0.02
TWIN
0.36
Current Ratio
BNC
5.17
TWIN
2.12
Quick Ratio
BNC
2.92
TWIN
0.64

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BNC
--
TWIN
0.89%
Payout Ratio
BNC
0.0%
TWIN
10.53%

AI Verdict

BNC BEARISH

The company exhibits a strong Piotroski F-Score of 7/9, indicating solid financial health based on profitability, leverage, and operating efficiency metrics. However, the absence of an Altman Z-Score, combined with extreme and likely erroneous profitability margins (e.g., 7327.84% profit margin), raises serious data integrity concerns. Valuation metrics are highly distorted, particularly the Price/Sales ratio of 65.36 and Forward P/E of 1.17, while historical performance shows a devastating 5-year return of -96.7%. Despite a low Debt/Equity ratio and strong liquidity, the combination of negative gross margin, implausible earnings figures, and catastrophic price depreciation signals severe underlying business or reporting issues.

Strengths
Strong Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 suggests robust accounting health on paper
Exceptionally low Debt/Equity ratio (0.02) indicates minimal financial leverage risk
High Current Ratio (5.17) and Quick Ratio (2.92) reflect strong short-term liquidity
Risks
Gross Margin of -32.84% indicates core operations are unprofitable and unsustainable
Implausibly high Profit and Operating Margins (7327.84% and 1257.16%) suggest data errors or accounting anomalies
Price/Sales ratio of 65.36 is extraordinarily high, indicating severe overvaluation relative to sales
TWIN BULLISH

TWIN exhibits strong fundamental health with a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 and a conservative Debt/Equity ratio of 0.36. The stock is significantly undervalued based on the Graham Number ($20.92) and Intrinsic Value ($44.84) relative to its current price of $17.78. While revenue growth is stagnant (0.30%), the company has seen a massive surge in earnings and a strong 1-year price recovery (+187.8%). The valuation is attractive, though the high PEG ratio and volatile earnings history suggest caution regarding long-term growth sustainability.

Strengths
Strong Piotroski F-Score (8/9) indicating high financial health
Deep value positioning (Price < Graham Number and Intrinsic Value)
Very low leverage with a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.36
Risks
Stagnant organic revenue growth (0.30% YoY)
Extremely thin operating margins (1.53%)
High PEG ratio (3.16) suggesting earnings growth may not justify the current multiple

Compare Another Pair

BNC vs TWIN: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares CEA Industries Inc. (BNC) and Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile