BNED vs TM
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a weak financial health profile with a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, indicating borderline stability, and no Altman Z-Score available, leaving bankruptcy risk unconfirmed but concerning given high leverage. Despite a low current P/E of 12.89 compared to sector average of 53.76, the negative forward P/E (-0.25) and collapsing earnings growth (-62% YoY) signal deteriorating profitability. The stock trades above the Graham Number of $11.53 but well above the intrinsic value of $4.97, suggesting overvaluation on a conservative basis. Persistent negative earnings surprises, declining ROE, and weak insider sentiment (40/100) further undermine confidence in a near-term turnaround.
TM shows neutral fundamentals based on deterministic rules. Financial strength is stable (F-Score 4/9). Mixed signals with both opportunities and risks present.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
BNED vs TM: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Barnes & Noble Education, Inc. (BNED) and Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.