BRK-B vs NEA
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
The deterministic health profile is weak, highlighted by a Piotroski F-Score of 3/9, indicating deteriorating operational efficiency and profitability trends. While the company maintains a fortress balance sheet with a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.19 and a Current Ratio of 7.07, the stock is trading at a significant premium to its growth-based intrinsic value of $217.21. Negative YoY revenue and earnings growth, coupled with a bearish technical trend, offset the positive analyst sentiment and long-term historical performance.
NEA exhibits strong operational health with a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9, yet it faces significant valuation and sustainability headwinds. The current price of $11.47 trades at a substantial premium to both the Graham Number ($8.62) and Intrinsic Value ($8.26). While the Price/Book ratio of 0.97 suggests fair value relative to assets, the unsustainable payout ratio of 307.50% indicates that dividends are likely being funded by capital or leverage rather than earnings. Technical trends are currently bearish, offsetting the fund's strong financial health score.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
BRK-B vs NEA: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) and Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund (NEA) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.