COTY vs MH
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
Coty Inc. exhibits severe fundamental weakness, highlighted by a Piotroski F-Score of 2/9, indicating poor financial health and operational deterioration. While valuation metrics like Price/Book (0.60) and Price/Sales (0.37) suggest the stock is deeply undervalued, this is likely a 'value trap' given the negative profit margins and stagnant revenue growth (0.50%). Liquidity is a primary concern with a Current Ratio of 0.79 and a Quick Ratio of 0.40, suggesting potential difficulty meeting short-term obligations. The consistent failure to meet earnings estimates (0/4 beats in the last year) further undermines confidence in management's guidance.
The company exhibits severe financial distress, highlighted by a weak Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 and a critical liquidity position with a current ratio of 0.83. Despite a 'Strong Buy' analyst consensus and a low forward P/E of 6.84, the fundamental health is compromised by high leverage (Debt/Equity of 3.48) and negative net profit margins. The technical trend is aggressively bearish, evidenced by a 16.3% drop in the last week and a -29.4% one-year return. The disconnect between analyst targets ($20.42) and the deterministic health scores suggests a high-risk value trap.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
COTY vs MH: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Coty Inc. (COTY) and McGraw Hill, Inc. (MH) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.