CPF vs HBNC
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
CPF exhibits strong fundamental value, trading below its Graham Number ($38.08) and significantly below its growth-based intrinsic value ($84.37). While the Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicates stable but not exceptional financial health, the company is delivering explosive earnings growth (103.10% YoY) and maintaining a sustainable dividend payout. Despite a bearish technical trend (10/100), the low forward P/E of 9.40 and consistent historical earnings beats suggest a significant valuation disconnect. The overall profile is that of a high-growth regional bank trading at a defensive discount.
HBNC presents a stark contradiction between valuation and fundamental health, highlighted by a weak Piotroski F-Score of 2/9. While the stock appears undervalued with a Forward P/E of 8.07 and a PEG of 0.80, the negative ROE (-20.73%) and ROA (-2.11%) indicate significant operational inefficiency or temporary distress. Despite astronomical revenue growth (218.7%), earnings are declining YoY (-18.5%), suggesting that top-line expansion is not translating to profitability. The technical trend is currently bearish (0/100), offsetting the positive analyst target of $20.80.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
CPF vs HBNC: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Central Pacific Financial Corp. (CPF) and Horizon Bancorp, Inc. (HBNC) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.