CW vs RTX
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
Curtiss-Wright exhibits exceptional operational health with a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 and a flawless 25-quarter earnings beat record. However, the company is severely overvalued, trading at $717.53—nearly double its growth-based intrinsic value of $378.78 and far exceeding its Graham Number of $140.92. While the fundamental quality is top-tier, the combination of a high P/E (55.88), bearish insider selling by the CEO and CFO, and a weak technical trend (10/100) suggests significant downside risk or a period of stagnation.
RTX exhibits stable financial health with a Piotroski F-Score of 5/9, yet it is trading at a severe premium compared to its Graham Number ($73.73) and Intrinsic Value ($96.67). While the company boasts an exceptional track record of earnings beats over 25 quarters and solid revenue growth, the valuation is stretched with a PEG ratio of 2.75. This fundamental overvaluation is compounded by bearish insider sentiment and a weak technical trend, suggesting that while the business is strong, the stock price is currently decoupled from its deterministic value.
Compare Another Pair
CW vs RTX: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) and RTX Corporation (RTX) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.