DNA vs RGNX
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
The deterministic health profile is critical, highlighted by a Piotroski F-Score of 1/9, indicating severe financial distress and operational deterioration. Despite a strong current ratio of 4.92 providing a short-term liquidity buffer, the company is facing a systemic collapse in growth with YoY revenue declining by 23.80%. Massive negative operating margins (-209.74%) and a catastrophic 5-year price decline of 98.1% suggest a failing business model. The combination of shrinking top-line revenue and bearish insider selling confirms a high-risk profile.
RGNX exhibits significant financial fragility, evidenced by a weak Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 and a lack of deterministic value markers like the Graham Number. While the company shows strong top-line revenue growth of 43%, this is offset by severe profitability deficits, including a profit margin of -113.75% and consistent earnings misses over the last four quarters. The stark divergence between the current price ($9.49) and the analyst target ($27.82) suggests a speculative valuation based on future pipeline success rather than current fundamentals. High debt-to-equity (2.54) and bearish insider sentiment further compound the risk profile.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
DNA vs RGNX: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc. (DNA) and REGENXBIO Inc. (RGNX) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.