FIG vs FORM
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
FIG exhibits severe financial instability, highlighted by a weak Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 and a catastrophic 1-year price decline of 84.9%. While the company maintains a strong gross margin (82.43%) and robust revenue growth (40%), these are overshadowed by a profit margin of -118.44% and aggressive insider selling. The lack of an Altman Z-Score prevents a definitive bankruptcy calculation, but the combination of negative ROE and a bearish technical trend suggests significant risk. The stock is currently trading near its 52-week low, reflecting a massive loss of investor confidence.
FormFactor exhibits exceptional operational health with a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 and a negligible debt-to-equity ratio of 0.03. However, the stock is currently experiencing a severe valuation disconnect, trading at $121.07—nearly 6x its growth-based intrinsic value ($20.06) and significantly above the analyst target price of $86.89. While earnings growth is explosive (131.8% YoY), the P/E ratio of 178.04 is unsustainable. The combination of aggressive insider selling and a bearish technical trend suggests the current price is driven by momentum rather than fundamental value.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
FIG vs FORM: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Figma, Inc. (FIG) and FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.