No connection

Search Results

FRD vs HDSN

FRD
Friedman Industries, Incorporated
NEUTRAL
Price
$18.10
Market Cap
$128.7M
Sector
Basic Materials
AI Confidence
80%
HDSN
Hudson Technologies, Inc.
BEARISH
Price
$6.00
Market Cap
$258.0M
Sector
Basic Materials
AI Confidence
85%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
FRD
8.15
HDSN
16.22
Forward P/E
FRD
--
HDSN
13.33
P/B Ratio
FRD
0.91
HDSN
1.03
P/S Ratio
FRD
0.22
HDSN
1.05
EV/EBITDA
FRD
9.6
HDSN
7.73

Profitability

Gross Margin
FRD
12.59%
HDSN
25.18%
Operating Margin
FRD
2.32%
HDSN
-16.23%
Profit Margin
FRD
2.68%
HDSN
6.76%
ROE
FRD
11.62%
HDSN
6.81%
ROA
FRD
4.69%
HDSN
4.54%

Growth

Revenue Growth
FRD
78.6%
HDSN
28.2%
Earnings Growth
FRD
--
HDSN
--

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
FRD
0.68
HDSN
0.02
Current Ratio
FRD
3.59
HDSN
3.26
Quick Ratio
FRD
0.91
HDSN
0.97

Dividends

Dividend Yield
FRD
0.88%
HDSN
--
Payout Ratio
FRD
7.21%
HDSN
0.0%

AI Verdict

FRD NEUTRAL

FRD presents a classic value-trap profile, characterized by a very weak Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 indicating deteriorating fundamental health despite explosive revenue growth of 78.6%. While the stock is objectively undervalued relative to its Graham Number ($31.6) and trades at a low P/E of 8.15, the razor-thin profit margins (2.68%) and bearish technical trend (0/100) offset the valuation appeal. The discrepancy between the high current ratio (3.59) and lower quick ratio (0.91) suggests a heavy reliance on inventory, which is risky in the cyclical steel industry. Overall, the strong top-line growth is not yet translating into fundamental financial strength.

Strengths
Exceptional YoY revenue growth of 78.60%
Deep value valuation with P/B of 0.91 and P/S of 0.22
Strong current ratio (3.59) indicating short-term liquidity
Risks
Critical fundamental weakness indicated by Piotroski F-Score of 2/9
Extremely thin profit margins (2.68%) leaving little room for error
Bearish technical trend (0/100) suggesting lack of market conviction
HDSN BEARISH

HDSN exhibits severe fundamental deterioration, highlighted by a weak Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 and a catastrophic YoY EPS decline of 116.7%. While the company maintains a clean balance sheet with very low debt (D/E 0.02) and trades below its Graham Number ($6.98), the divergence between strong revenue growth (28.2%) and negative operating margins (-16.23%) suggests an unsustainable operational model. Insider selling and a bearish technical trend further undermine the optimistic analyst target of $9.00.

Strengths
Very low leverage with a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.02
Strong short-term liquidity with a Current Ratio of 3.26
Robust top-line revenue growth of 28.20% YoY
Risks
Severe operational inefficiency indicated by a -16.23% operating margin
Critical decline in profitability with YoY EPS growth at -116.7%
Weak financial health baseline (Piotroski F-Score 2/9)

Compare Another Pair

FRD vs HDSN: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Friedman Industries, Incorporated (FRD) and Hudson Technologies, Inc. (HDSN) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile