No connection

Search Results

FRD vs LGO

FRD
Friedman Industries, Incorporated
NEUTRAL
Price
$18.10
Market Cap
$128.7M
Sector
Basic Materials
AI Confidence
80%
LGO
Largo Inc.
BEARISH
Price
$1.19
Market Cap
$115.8M
Sector
Basic Materials
AI Confidence
95%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
FRD
8.15
LGO
--
Forward P/E
FRD
--
LGO
13.22
P/B Ratio
FRD
0.91
LGO
0.59
P/S Ratio
FRD
0.22
LGO
1.05
EV/EBITDA
FRD
9.6
LGO
-7.93

Profitability

Gross Margin
FRD
12.59%
LGO
-20.71%
Operating Margin
FRD
2.32%
LGO
-147.85%
Profit Margin
FRD
2.68%
LGO
-62.34%
ROE
FRD
11.62%
LGO
-44.67%
ROA
FRD
4.69%
LGO
-9.14%

Growth

Revenue Growth
FRD
78.6%
LGO
-8.2%
Earnings Growth
FRD
--
LGO
--

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
FRD
0.68
LGO
0.78
Current Ratio
FRD
3.59
LGO
0.51
Quick Ratio
FRD
0.91
LGO
0.14

Dividends

Dividend Yield
FRD
0.88%
LGO
--
Payout Ratio
FRD
7.21%
LGO
0.0%

AI Verdict

FRD NEUTRAL

FRD presents a classic value-trap profile, characterized by a very weak Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 indicating deteriorating fundamental health despite explosive revenue growth of 78.6%. While the stock is objectively undervalued relative to its Graham Number ($31.6) and trades at a low P/E of 8.15, the razor-thin profit margins (2.68%) and bearish technical trend (0/100) offset the valuation appeal. The discrepancy between the high current ratio (3.59) and lower quick ratio (0.91) suggests a heavy reliance on inventory, which is risky in the cyclical steel industry. Overall, the strong top-line growth is not yet translating into fundamental financial strength.

Strengths
Exceptional YoY revenue growth of 78.60%
Deep value valuation with P/B of 0.91 and P/S of 0.22
Strong current ratio (3.59) indicating short-term liquidity
Risks
Critical fundamental weakness indicated by Piotroski F-Score of 2/9
Extremely thin profit margins (2.68%) leaving little room for error
Bearish technical trend (0/100) suggesting lack of market conviction
LGO BEARISH

LGO exhibits critical financial fragility, highlighted by a Piotroski F-Score of 1/9, indicating severe operational and financial deterioration. The company is facing a liquidity crisis with a Quick Ratio of 0.14 and a Current Ratio of 0.51, suggesting an inability to meet short-term obligations. While the stock trades at a discount to book value (P/B 0.59), this is likely a 'value trap' given the negative gross margins (-20.71%) and consistent revenue decline. The long-term price trajectory is catastrophic, with a 92.5% loss over five years.

Strengths
Trading significantly below book value (P/B 0.59)
Forward P/E of 13.22 suggests a projected return to profitability
Debt/Equity ratio (0.78) is relatively moderate for the mining sector
Risks
Severe liquidity risk with a Quick Ratio of 0.14
Negative Gross Margin indicates the core product is being sold at a loss
Piotroski F-Score of 1/9 signals extreme financial distress

Compare Another Pair

FRD vs LGO: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Friedman Industries, Incorporated (FRD) and Largo Inc. (LGO) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile