No connection

Search Results

LEE vs TRVG

LEE
Lee Enterprises, Incorporated
BEARISH
Price
$8.45
Market Cap
$187.8M
Sector
Communication Services
AI Confidence
85%
TRVG
trivago N.V.
NEUTRAL
Price
$2.78
Market Cap
$196.3M
Sector
Communication Services
AI Confidence
80%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
LEE
--
TRVG
15.44
Forward P/E
LEE
14.82
TRVG
26.01
P/B Ratio
LEE
-1.08
TRVG
0.8
P/S Ratio
LEE
0.34
TRVG
0.36
EV/EBITDA
LEE
13.76
TRVG
348.25

Profitability

Gross Margin
LEE
60.33%
TRVG
97.25%
Operating Margin
LEE
6.24%
TRVG
5.81%
Profit Margin
LEE
-4.83%
TRVG
2.04%
ROE
LEE
--
TRVG
5.46%
ROA
LEE
3.22%
TRVG
0.29%

Growth

Revenue Growth
LEE
-10.0%
TRVG
26.6%
Earnings Growth
LEE
--
TRVG
305.1%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
LEE
--
TRVG
0.17
Current Ratio
LEE
0.74
TRVG
2.22
Quick Ratio
LEE
0.57
TRVG
2.15

Dividends

Dividend Yield
LEE
--
TRVG
--
Payout Ratio
LEE
0.0%
TRVG
0.0%

AI Verdict

LEE BEARISH

Lee Enterprises presents a high-risk profile characterized by a stable Piotroski F-Score (5/9) that masks severe underlying financial distress. The company suffers from negative shareholder equity (Price/Book: -1.08) and critical liquidity issues with a current ratio of 0.74. Despite a recent 6-month price surge, the fundamental trajectory is sharply negative, evidenced by a -10% revenue decline and catastrophic earnings misses over the last four quarters. The lack of a Graham Number or Intrinsic Value calculation reflects the absence of positive earnings and book value, rendering traditional value metrics inapplicable.

Strengths
Positive operating margin (6.24%) suggesting core business still generates some cash
Strong gross margin (60.33%)
Very low Price/Sales ratio (0.34) indicating deep valuation discount
Risks
Negative Book Value (P/B -1.08) indicating liabilities exceed assets
Severe liquidity risk with Current Ratio (0.74) and Quick Ratio (0.57) below 1.0
Consistent earnings failure (0/4 beats in last 4 quarters with massive negative surprises)
TRVG NEUTRAL

TRVG presents a classic value-trap profile, characterized by a weak Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 and a bearish technical trend (0/100), despite trading significantly below its Graham Number ($3.76) and Intrinsic Value ($5.31). While the company shows impressive year-over-year revenue (26.6%) and earnings growth, these gains are offset by razor-thin profit margins (2.04%) and a high PEG ratio (5.98), suggesting growth is not efficiently translating into shareholder value. The balance sheet is healthy with low debt (D/E 0.17) and strong liquidity, but the lack of operational momentum prevents a bullish rating.

Strengths
Deep value valuation with Price/Book at 0.80
Very low Price/Sales ratio of 0.36
Strong short-term revenue growth (26.6% YoY)
Risks
Poor operational health indicated by Piotroski F-Score of 3/9
Extremely thin net profit margins (2.04%)
Severe long-term price erosion (-66% over 5 years)

Compare Another Pair

LEE vs TRVG: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Lee Enterprises, Incorporated (LEE) and trivago N.V. (TRVG) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile