LSCC vs NVDA
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
LSCC exhibits a strong deterministic health profile with a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9, indicating robust operational efficiency and financial stability. However, this fundamental strength is starkly contrasted by an extreme valuation disconnect, evidenced by a trailing P/E of 5388 and a Graham Number of $1.53. While revenue growth remains healthy at 24.2%, recent earnings performance has deteriorated significantly with a -39.63% average surprise over the last four quarters. The stock is currently trading at a massive premium based on future growth expectations rather than current profitability.
NVDA exhibits strong financial health with a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9, indicating robust operational efficiency and solvency. While the current price of $182.08 is significantly above the Graham Number ($26.71) and the growth-based intrinsic value ($144.55), the stock is fundamentally undervalued relative to its growth, as evidenced by a PEG ratio of 0.72 and a highly attractive Forward P/E of 16.38. The company's elite profitability margins (55.6% profit margin) and minimal debt (0.07 D/E) provide a massive cushion for volatility. Despite bearish insider sentiment and short-term technical weakness, the long-term growth trajectory remains exceptionally strong.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
LSCC vs NVDA: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.