MEC vs QUAD
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
MEC exhibits severe fundamental weakness, highlighted by a Piotroski F-Score of 2/9, indicating poor financial health and deteriorating operational efficiency. Despite a 'Strong Buy' analyst consensus and positive revenue growth of 10.7%, the company is currently unprofitable with negative profit (-1.48%) and operating margins (-4.64%). The disconnect between the strong 1-year price performance (+73.5%) and the underlying financial decay is further exacerbated by bearish insider selling and a failing technical trend score. The company is essentially growing its top line while eroding its bottom line.
QUAD presents a classic 'value trap' profile, characterized by a stable Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 and a precarious balance sheet. While the company is deeply undervalued on a Price-to-Sales (0.18) and Forward P/E (6.28) basis, this is offset by a concerning Debt/Equity ratio of 3.98 and a Current Ratio below 1.0 (0.94), indicating liquidity risks. Earnings are growing despite a consistent decline in top-line revenue, suggesting efficiency gains rather than organic growth. The stock trades significantly above its Graham Number ($5.74) but well below its growth-based intrinsic value ($17.11).
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
MEC vs QUAD: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. (MEC) and Quad/Graphics, Inc. (QUAD) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.