No connection

Search Results

NNBR vs SFWL

NNBR
NN, Inc.
BEARISH
Price
$1.57
Market Cap
$78.8M
Sector
Industrials
AI Confidence
85%
SFWL
Shengfeng Development Limited
NEUTRAL
Price
$0.90
Market Cap
$74.2M
Sector
Industrials
AI Confidence
80%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
NNBR
--
SFWL
6.43
Forward P/E
NNBR
6.73
SFWL
--
P/B Ratio
NNBR
2.32
SFWL
0.56
P/S Ratio
NNBR
0.19
SFWL
0.13
EV/EBITDA
NNBR
22.07
SFWL
5.63

Profitability

Gross Margin
NNBR
14.18%
SFWL
9.27%
Operating Margin
NNBR
-21.98%
SFWL
2.94%
Profit Margin
NNBR
-8.05%
SFWL
2.08%
ROE
NNBR
-21.15%
SFWL
9.31%
ROA
NNBR
-2.52%
SFWL
3.21%

Growth

Revenue Growth
NNBR
-1.7%
SFWL
11.6%
Earnings Growth
NNBR
--
SFWL
3.8%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
NNBR
1.43
SFWL
0.63
Current Ratio
NNBR
1.83
SFWL
1.27
Quick Ratio
NNBR
0.94
SFWL
1.12

Dividends

Dividend Yield
NNBR
--
SFWL
--
Payout Ratio
NNBR
0.0%
SFWL
0.0%

AI Verdict

NNBR BEARISH

NNBR exhibits severe fundamental weakness, highlighted by a Piotroski F-Score of 2/9, indicating poor financial health and deteriorating operational efficiency. While the stock appears superficially cheap with a Price/Sales ratio of 0.19 and a low Forward P/E of 6.73, these metrics are overshadowed by negative operating margins (-21.98%) and shrinking revenue growth. Despite a 'Strong Buy' analyst consensus and a high target price of $5.50, the combination of a bearish technical trend and negative ROE suggests a value trap. The company is currently struggling to maintain profitability and growth, making the analyst targets appear disconnected from the deterministic health data.

Strengths
Extremely low Price/Sales ratio (0.19) suggesting deep undervaluation of revenue
Low Forward P/E (6.73) if earnings projections materialize
Healthy Current Ratio (1.83) providing short-term liquidity
Risks
Critical financial health (Piotroski F-Score 2/9)
Negative operating and profit margins indicating an unsustainable business model
Negative revenue growth (YoY -1.70%)
SFWL NEUTRAL

SFWL presents a classic deep-value paradox: the deterministic health is stable with a Piotroski F-Score of 5/9, and the stock is significantly undervalued relative to its Graham Number ($2.24) and Intrinsic Value ($1.78). However, this fundamental value is completely decoupled from market sentiment, as evidenced by a 0/100 technical trend and a devastating 5-year price decline of 77.6%. While the balance sheet is healthy and the P/E ratio is low (6.43), the company suffers from razor-thin profit margins (2.08%) and a lack of growth catalysts. The stock is currently a 'value trap' candidate where fundamental cheapness is offset by severe bearish momentum.

Strengths
Significant undervaluation with P/B of 0.56
Low P/E ratio of 6.43 compared to sector averages
Stable financial health indicated by Piotroski F-Score of 5/9
Risks
Extreme bearish technical trend (0/100)
Very thin net profit margins (2.08%) leaving little room for error
Severe long-term price erosion (-77.6% over 5 years)

Compare Another Pair

NNBR vs SFWL: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares NN, Inc. (NNBR) and Shengfeng Development Limited (SFWL) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile