No connection

Search Results

NOMA vs RGS

NOMA
Nomadar Corp.
BEARISH
Price
$3.99
Market Cap
$66.9M
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
95%
RGS
Regis Corporation
BEARISH
Price
$27.01
Market Cap
$67.5M
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
85%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
NOMA
--
RGS
0.6
Forward P/E
NOMA
--
RGS
-10.23
P/B Ratio
NOMA
10.96
RGS
0.36
P/S Ratio
NOMA
72.6
RGS
0.29
EV/EBITDA
NOMA
--
RGS
14.67

Profitability

Gross Margin
NOMA
51.75%
RGS
36.56%
Operating Margin
NOMA
-4190.54%
RGS
10.85%
Profit Margin
NOMA
0.0%
RGS
50.79%
ROE
NOMA
-94.99%
RGS
94.31%
ROA
NOMA
-24.22%
RGS
2.6%

Growth

Revenue Growth
NOMA
451.7%
RGS
22.3%
Earnings Growth
NOMA
--
RGS
-94.1%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
NOMA
0.5
RGS
1.82
Current Ratio
NOMA
0.07
RGS
0.53
Quick Ratio
NOMA
0.06
RGS
0.28

Dividends

Dividend Yield
NOMA
--
RGS
--
Payout Ratio
NOMA
0.0%
RGS
0.0%

AI Verdict

NOMA BEARISH

Nomadar Corp. exhibits severe financial distress, highlighted by a critical Piotroski F-Score of 1/9 and a catastrophic Current Ratio of 0.07, indicating an immediate liquidity crisis. While the company shows hyper-growth in revenue (451.70% YoY), this is completely offset by an unsustainable operating margin of -4190.54%. The stock is fundamentally overvalued with a Price/Sales ratio of 72.60 and a Price/Book ratio of 10.96. Given the bearish technical trend and lack of profitability, the company faces significant insolvency risk.

Strengths
Exceptional YoY revenue growth of 451.70%
Strong Gross Margin of 51.75%
Relatively low Debt/Equity ratio of 0.50
Risks
Severe liquidity crisis (Current Ratio 0.07)
Extreme operating losses (-4190.54% Operating Margin)
Extreme valuation premium (P/S 72.60)
RGS BEARISH

RGS exhibits classic 'value trap' characteristics, anchored by a weak Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 and severe liquidity distress. While the current price is significantly below the Graham Number ($276.49), this discrepancy is likely due to impaired assets or an unsustainable capital structure, as evidenced by a Current Ratio of 0.53 and a Quick Ratio of 0.28. The anomalous P/E of 0.60 contrasted with a negative Forward P/E of -10.23 suggests a one-time gain masking a collapse in operational earnings. Despite strong top-line revenue growth, the company's financial health is critical, and technical trends remain entirely bearish.

Strengths
Strong YoY revenue growth of 22.30%
Very low Price-to-Sales ratio (0.29)
Trading significantly below book value (P/B 0.36)
Risks
Severe liquidity crisis with a Quick Ratio of 0.28
High leverage with Debt/Equity at 1.82
Catastrophic earnings collapse (YoY Earnings Growth -94.10%)

Compare Another Pair

NOMA vs RGS: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Nomadar Corp. (NOMA) and Regis Corporation (RGS) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile