No connection

Search Results

PAMT vs SHIM

PAMT
PAMT CORP
BEARISH
Price
$9.45
Market Cap
$197.9M
Sector
Industrials
AI Confidence
90%
SHIM
Shimmick Corporation
BEARISH
Price
$5.28
Market Cap
$190.6M
Sector
Industrials
AI Confidence
95%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
PAMT
--
SHIM
--
Forward P/E
PAMT
--
SHIM
13.89
P/B Ratio
PAMT
0.94
SHIM
-3.36
P/S Ratio
PAMT
0.33
SHIM
0.39
EV/EBITDA
PAMT
120.96
SHIM
-31.52

Profitability

Gross Margin
PAMT
11.87%
SHIM
6.82%
Operating Margin
PAMT
-29.82%
SHIM
-0.89%
Profit Margin
PAMT
-8.8%
SHIM
-5.19%
ROE
PAMT
-21.56%
SHIM
--
ROA
PAMT
-6.91%
SHIM
-5.79%

Growth

Revenue Growth
PAMT
-15.1%
SHIM
-3.0%
Earnings Growth
PAMT
--
SHIM
--

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
PAMT
1.62
SHIM
--
Current Ratio
PAMT
1.23
SHIM
0.89
Quick Ratio
PAMT
1.14
SHIM
0.82

Dividends

Dividend Yield
PAMT
--
SHIM
--
Payout Ratio
PAMT
0.0%
SHIM
0.0%

AI Verdict

PAMT BEARISH

PAMT exhibits severe financial distress, anchored by a weak Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 and a catastrophic year-over-year EPS decline of 369.2%. While the stock appears cheap on a Price-to-Book (0.94) and Price-to-Sales (0.33) basis, these metrics are overshadowed by negative operating margins (-29.82%) and shrinking revenues (-15.10%). The company has transitioned from a period of profitability (2021-2023) into a consistent loss-making cycle with significant earnings misses. The combination of deteriorating fundamentals and a 0/100 technical trend suggests a value trap rather than a value opportunity.

Strengths
Low Price-to-Sales ratio (0.33) suggests significant revenue relative to market cap
Trading slightly below book value (P/B 0.94)
Current ratio of 1.23 indicates adequate short-term liquidity
Risks
Severe earnings collapse with YoY EPS growth of -369.2%
Negative operating margins (-29.82%) indicating an unsustainable cost structure
Consistent revenue contraction (-15.10% YoY and -15.14% Q/Q)
SHIM BEARISH

SHIM exhibits catastrophic fundamental health, highlighted by a Piotroski F-Score of 0/9 and a negative Price-to-Book ratio of -3.36, indicating negative shareholder equity. While the stock has experienced a speculative price surge over the last year (+238.5%), this movement is completely decoupled from financial reality, as the company suffers from negative profit margins, shrinking revenue, and liquidity risks (Current Ratio < 1.0). The combination of consistent earnings misses and bearish insider selling suggests the current price is driven by momentum rather than intrinsic value.

Strengths
Significant short-term price momentum (+77.8% in 1 month)
Low Price-to-Sales ratio (0.39) relative to revenue
Recent YoY EPS growth improvement from a very low base
Risks
Extreme financial distress indicated by Piotroski F-Score of 0/9
Negative Book Value suggests insolvency risk or severe capital erosion
Liquidity crunch with Current Ratio (0.89) and Quick Ratio (0.82) below 1.0

Compare Another Pair

PAMT vs SHIM: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares PAMT CORP (PAMT) and Shimmick Corporation (SHIM) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile