No connection

Search Results

PM vs SENEA

PM
Philip Morris International Inc.
BULLISH
Price
$155.43
Market Cap
$241.95B
Sector
Consumer Defensive
AI Confidence
92%
SENEA
Seneca Foods Corporation
BULLISH
Price
$140.27
Market Cap
$965.2M
Sector
Consumer Defensive
AI Confidence
75%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
PM
22.17
SENEA
10.81
Forward P/E
PM
21.59
SENEA
--
P/B Ratio
PM
-22.17
SENEA
1.34
P/S Ratio
PM
6.05
SENEA
0.6
EV/EBITDA
PM
16.14
SENEA
6.91

Profitability

Gross Margin
PM
66.92%
SENEA
12.57%
Operating Margin
PM
40.75%
SENEA
12.35%
Profit Margin
PM
21.57%
SENEA
5.58%
ROE
PM
--
SENEA
13.57%
ROA
PM
14.94%
SENEA
6.67%

Growth

Revenue Growth
PM
9.4%
SENEA
1.1%
Earnings Growth
PM
13.1%
SENEA
207.8%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
PM
--
SENEA
0.41
Current Ratio
PM
0.85
SENEA
4.34
Quick Ratio
PM
0.37
SENEA
0.7

Dividends

Dividend Yield
PM
3.78%
SENEA
--
Payout Ratio
PM
78.76%
SENEA
0.0%

AI Verdict

PM BULLISH

Philip Morris International (PM) presents a compelling investment case supported by strong profitability, consistent earnings growth, and a resilient dividend profile. Despite near-term price weakness over the past six months (-7.3%), the stock has delivered exceptional long-term returns (+153.1% over 5Y), underpinned by robust YoY EPS growth of 17.3% and a track record of beating earnings estimates in 22 of the last 25 quarters. The company’s high operating margin (40.75%) and gross margin (66.92%) reflect pricing power and cost discipline in a defensive sector, while its forward P/E of 21.59 appears justified given growth and stability. Analysts concur with a unanimous buy rating and a $185.75 target price, implying ~19.5% upside, reinforcing confidence in continued outperformance.

Strengths
Exceptional profitability with operating margin of 40.75% and gross margin of 66.92%, among the highest in consumer defensive sector
Consistent earnings growth: 13.1% YoY and 17.3% most recent Q/Q EPS growth, demonstrating strong underlying momentum
Outstanding earnings surprise record: 22 out of 25 quarters beat estimates, with an average surprise of +4.82% over the last four
Risks
Negative Price/Book ratio (-22.17) suggests deep negative equity, likely due to aggressive share buybacks exceeding retained earnings
Weak liquidity profile: current ratio of 0.85 and quick ratio of 0.37 indicate potential near-term cash flow pressure
Missing key financials (debt/equity, EV, cash/debt) limits full health assessment and raises transparency concerns
SENEA BULLISH

SENEA presents a compelling value opportunity, trading significantly below its Graham Number ($174.71) and Intrinsic Value ($382.62). The Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicates stable financial health, though not exceptional, while the absence of an Altman Z-Score prevents a definitive bankruptcy risk assessment. The company exhibits strong profitability metrics with an ROE of 13.57% and a very low P/E of 10.81 relative to the sector average. However, the stark divergence between the Current Ratio (4.34) and Quick Ratio (0.70) suggests a high concentration of capital in inventory, which is a key risk in the packaged foods industry.

Strengths
Deeply undervalued relative to Graham Number ($174.71) and Intrinsic Value ($382.62)
Low valuation multiples (P/E 10.81, PEG 0.83) compared to sector peers
Strong balance sheet with low Debt/Equity ratio of 0.41
Risks
Stagnant revenue growth (YoY 1.10%) suggesting a lack of organic expansion
High inventory risk evidenced by the low Quick Ratio (0.70) relative to Current Ratio
Bearish technical trend (0/100) and recent sharp 1-week price decline (-16.2%)

Compare Another Pair

PM vs SENEA: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Philip Morris International Inc. (PM) and Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEA) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile