SWIM vs TRNS
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
SWIM exhibits stable financial health with a Piotroski F-Score of 6/9, though it lacks an Altman Z-Score for bankruptcy risk assessment. The stock is significantly overvalued relative to its Graham Number ($2.65) and Intrinsic Value ($0.63), trading at a steep premium based on growth expectations. While revenue growth is consistent at 14.5%, the company struggles with negative operating margins (-10.73%) and highly volatile earnings. Analyst sentiment remains bullish with a target of $8.50, creating a sharp divergence between deterministic value metrics and market expectations.
Transcat exhibits strong operational health with a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 and a conservative debt profile, yet it is fundamentally decoupled from its valuation. While revenue growth remains robust at 25.6%, the company is suffering a severe earnings collapse with YoY EPS growth down 42.2% and a razor-thin profit margin of 2.47%. The current price of $81.76 represents a massive premium over the Graham Number ($24.66) and Intrinsic Value ($5.95), suggesting the market is pricing in growth that is not currently manifesting in the bottom line.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
SWIM vs TRNS: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM) and Transcat, Inc. (TRNS) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.