TOMZ vs UGRO
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
TOMZ exhibits critical financial distress, highlighted by a Piotroski F-Score of 1/9 and a severe accumulated deficit of $58.1 million. While the company maintains a strong gross margin (54.60%), it is unable to translate this into operating profitability, with an operating margin of -161.87%. The balance sheet is highly leveraged with a Debt/Equity ratio of 5.82 and a dangerously low Quick Ratio of 0.25, indicating a liquidity crisis. Despite a single analyst's 'strong buy' rating and a high price target, the fundamental data and a -85% 5-year price trend suggest a high risk of insolvency or further dilution.
UGRO exhibits severe financial distress, anchored by a weak Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 and a catastrophic Current Ratio of 0.00, indicating a total lack of liquidity. The company is operating with negative equity (Price/Book of -0.14) and an unsustainable operating margin of -1194.67%. Despite a recent short-term price spike, the long-term trend is devastating with a 95% loss over five years and consistent, massive earnings misses. The deterministic health indicators suggest a high probability of insolvency or significant dilutive capital raises.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
TOMZ vs UGRO: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc. (TOMZ) and urban-gro, Inc. (UGRO) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.