AMBQ
BEARISHAt a glance
Key valuation, profitability, growth, and risk metrics.
AI Analysis
AI-powered fundamental assessment
Key Strengths
Key Risks
Performance Snowflake
Multi-dimensional analysis across 5 key categories
Stock trades at a premium valuation despite negative earnings and no intrinsic value support; premium justified only by speculative growth expectations.
- Price/Sales of 7.33 is below sector average (avg: 90.93 P/E, but no direct PS comparison)
- No debt provides valuation stability
- No Graham Number or intrinsic value due to negative earnings
- Forward P/E of -22.00 implies no earnings to value
- Price/Sales of 7.33 is high for a loss-making company
- No cash flow or FCF data to support valuation
Growth expectations are minimal; upside is speculative and not supported by fundamentals.
- Recent earnings surprises of up to 70.5% suggest potential for better-than-expected performance
- Analyst target price of $38.75 implies 53% upside from current price
- Revenue growth is only 2.00% YoY, indicating stagnation
- Most recent Q/Q EPS growth is -45.5%, showing worsening profitability
- No forward guidance or growth catalysts evident
Historical performance shows persistent underperformance and declining investor confidence despite short-term earnings beats.
- 3 of last 4 quarters beat earnings estimates
- Improving trend in earnings surprises (from -70.5% to +16.6%)
- Consistently negative earnings across all periods
- 52-week high of $51.76 vs current $25.36 indicates significant decline
- 5-year, 3-year, 1-year, and 6-month returns all down 34.2% to 44.7%
Despite strong liquidity, the company is unprofitable and failing on core operational metrics, with Piotroski F-Score signaling high risk of failure.
- Debt/Equity of 0.00 indicates no leverage risk
- Current and quick ratios are extremely high (8.76 and 7.69), indicating strong liquidity
- Piotroski F-Score of 1/9 is the lowest possible, indicating severe financial distress
- Negative ROE, ROA, and ROIC suggest capital is not being deployed effectively
- No Altman Z-Score available, but the financial profile suggests distress risk
No dividend policy exists; company is loss-making and cannot afford dividends.
- No dividend yield or payout ratio
- Dividend strength is 0/100
- Company is not distributing profits, and cannot due to losses
Stock Price & Analyst Targets
Real-time price movements and analyst price targets
Multi-Horizon Performance vs Peers
Price momentum across 5Y → 1W horizons for AMBQ and closest competitors.
| Company | 5Y | 3Y | 1Y | 6M | 1M | 1W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMBQ
Ambiq Micro, Inc.
Primary
|
-34.2% | -34.2% | -34.2% | -26.4% | -13.5% | -10.7% |
|
HKD
AMTD Digital Inc.
Peer
|
-89.6% | -79.9% | -19.5% | -4.5% | +12.7% | -6.1% |
|
MLAB
Mesa Laboratories, Inc.
Peer
|
-61.0% | -39.5% | -13.6% | +43.8% | +25.5% | +3.8% |
|
CINT
CI&T Inc.
Peer
|
-76.7% | +5.8% | -20.3% | -14.7% | -12.6% | -10.8% |
|
RDVT
Red Violet, Inc.
Peer
|
+90.6% | +145.8% | +7.3% | -23.2% | -0.5% | +11.0% |
Positive values indicate cumulative gains over the specified period. Comparables pulled from the same sector to highlight whether momentum is stock-specific or industry-wide.
Historical Performance Trends
Long-term financial metrics and growth patterns
Revenue & Net Income
Profit & Operating Margins
Return on Equity (ROE)
Quarterly Revenue Growth
Valuation Metrics
Key valuation ratios and pricing indicators
Profitability
Profit margins and return metrics
Growth
Revenue and earnings growth rates
Financial Health
Balance sheet strength and liquidity metrics
Financial Statement Flow
Interactive flow visualization showing how money moves through the company Q3 2025
Quarterly Earnings History
EPS performance vs analyst estimates
Technology Sector Comparison
Similar Companies
Peer comparison within the same industry
| Company | AI Rating | Market Cap | P/E | ROE | Profit Margin | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMBQ
Ambiq Micro, Inc.
|
BEARISH | $531.38M | - | -29.4% | -50.3% | $25.36 | |
|
HKD
AMTD Digital Inc.
|
NEUTRAL | $531.13M | 9.39 | 25.4% | 40.2% | $1.69 | Compare |
|
MLAB
Mesa Laboratories, Inc.
|
BEARISH | $540.6M | 150.54 | 2.2% | 1.5% | $97.85 | Compare |
|
CINT
CI&T Inc.
|
BULLISH | $546.08M | 14.1 | 13.8% | 8.3% | $4.23 | Compare |
|
RDVT
Red Violet, Inc.
|
NEUTRAL | $556.21M | 43.32 | 14.0% | 14.6% | $39.42 | Compare |
Recent Insider Trading
Insider buy and sell transactions from the last 6 months
| Date | Insider | Position | Transaction | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-06 | WINZELER JEFFREY G | Chief Financial Officer | Stock Award | 41,728 | - |
| 2026-03-06 | ESAKA FUMIHIDE | Chief Executive Officer | Stock Award | 160,616 | - |
| 2026-03-06 | HANSON SCOTT MCLEAN PH.D. | Chief Technology Officer | Stock Award | 80,308 | - |
| 2026-03-06 | CHEN SEAN CHIHHSIANG | President | Stock Award | 64,246 | - |
| 2026-02-18 | HSIEH WEN HSUAN | Director | Option Exercise | 238,931 | $3,010,531 |
| 2026-01-26 | TAUTGES JOSEPH A | Director | Sale | 7,800 | $241,800 |
| 2026-01-26 | HANSON SCOTT MCLEAN PH.D. | Chief Technology Officer | Sale | 10,000 | $310,000 |
| 2025-10-07 | ESAKA FUMIHIDE | Chief Executive Officer | Option Exercise | 53,660 | $315,521 |
| 2025-10-02 | WINZELER JEFFREY G | Chief Financial Officer | Stock Award | 52,667 | - |
| 2025-10-02 | ESAKA FUMIHIDE | Chief Executive Officer | Stock Award | 159,907 | - |
| 2025-10-02 | HANSON SCOTT MCLEAN PH.D. | Chief Financial Officer | Stock Award | 83,819 | - |
| 2025-10-02 | CHEN SEAN CHIHHSIANG | President | Stock Award | 56,029 | - |
Wall Street Analysts
Professional analyst ratings and price targets
Past News Coverage
Recent headlines mentioning AMBQ from our newsroom.