AAPL vs CLS
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
Apple exhibits a stable financial foundation with a Piotroski F-Score of 6/9, though it currently trades at a significant premium to its intrinsic value of $233.05 and Graham Number of $32.65. While the company demonstrates elite profitability with an ROE of 152.02% and a consistent track record of earnings beats over 25 quarters, valuation metrics are stretched with a PEG ratio of 2.27. The outlook is tempered by bearish insider activity from the CEO and CFO, alongside a technical trend score of 0/100, suggesting a period of consolidation or correction despite strong fundamental growth.
Celestica Inc. exhibits a stark divergence between its explosive growth metrics and its deterministic health indicators, highlighted by a weak Piotroski F-Score of 3/9. While the company delivers exceptional revenue (43.6%) and earnings (77.7%) growth with a consistent track record of beats, the current price of $410.21 represents a massive premium over both the Graham Number ($55.82) and the growth-based Intrinsic Value ($211.81). The combination of bearish insider selling and a weak technical trend suggests the stock may be overextended despite strong analyst sentiment. Consequently, the valuation risk currently outweighs the growth momentum.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
AAPL vs CLS: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Apple Inc. (AAPL) and Celestica Inc. (CLS) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.