ACM vs PAC
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
ACM's Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 indicates stable financial health, though the absence of an Altman Z-Score limits distress risk assessment. The stock trades at a significant premium to both the Graham Number ($44.91) and intrinsic value ($33.18), currently priced at $97.08, suggesting overvaluation. Despite solid ROE of 28.09% and a history of consistent earnings beats (22 of 25 quarters), recent YoY earnings decline (-29.10%) and insider selling raise concerns. Analysts maintain a 'buy' recommendation with a $130.33 target, implying 24% upside, but weak technical trend (0/100) and bearish insider activity temper near-term optimism.
PAC presents a dichotomy between elite operational profitability and concerning top-line contraction. The deterministic baseline shows a stable Piotroski F-Score of 6/9, though the Graham Number ($7.19) is irrelevant due to an extreme Price-to-Book ratio (1250.27), indicating the company is valued on growth and cash flow rather than assets. While the intrinsic value of $336.6 suggests significant upside, the current bearish technical trend (0/100) and negative YoY revenue growth (-20.60%) offset the strong margins and analyst 'buy' recommendations.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
ACM vs PAC: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares AECOM (ACM) and Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. (PAC) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.