No connection

Search Results

ACU vs BRCC

ACU
Acme United Corporation
NEUTRAL
Price
$43.48
Market Cap
$165.6M
Sector
Consumer Defensive
AI Confidence
85%
BRCC
BRC Inc.
BEARISH
Price
$0.95
Market Cap
$108.9M
Sector
Consumer Defensive
AI Confidence
68%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
ACU
18.74
BRCC
--
Forward P/E
ACU
19.41
BRCC
-31.67
P/B Ratio
ACU
1.41
BRCC
2.27
P/S Ratio
ACU
0.84
BRCC
0.28
EV/EBITDA
ACU
9.42
BRCC
-61.2

Profitability

Gross Margin
ACU
39.39%
BRCC
36.33%
Operating Margin
ACU
6.1%
BRCC
1.99%
Profit Margin
ACU
5.18%
BRCC
-2.86%
ROE
ACU
9.07%
BRCC
-47.48%
ROA
ACU
5.52%
BRCC
-2.74%

Growth

Revenue Growth
ACU
3.4%
BRCC
2.6%
Earnings Growth
ACU
9.4%
BRCC
--

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
ACU
0.24
BRCC
0.85
Current Ratio
ACU
4.21
BRCC
1.33
Quick Ratio
ACU
1.43
BRCC
0.49

Dividends

Dividend Yield
ACU
1.41%
BRCC
--
Payout Ratio
ACU
25.3%
BRCC
0.0%

AI Verdict

ACU NEUTRAL

ACU presents a dichotomy between a rock-solid balance sheet and deteriorating short-term operational momentum. The Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicates stable but mediocre financial health, while the absence of an Altman Z-Score is offset by an exceptionally low Debt/Equity ratio (0.24) and a high Current Ratio (4.21). While the stock is fairly valued—trading between its Graham Number ($40.16) and Intrinsic Value ($48.95)—the recent Q/Q EPS collapse of -47.8% and a bearish technical trend (0/100) suggest significant near-term headwinds.

Strengths
Exceptional liquidity with a Current Ratio of 4.21
Very low leverage (Debt/Equity of 0.24)
Conservative dividend payout ratio (25.30%)
Risks
Severe recent earnings contraction (-47.8% Q/Q EPS growth)
Bearish technical trend (0/100 score)
Low Piotroski F-Score (4/9) indicating stagnant operational efficiency
BRCC BEARISH

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a weak financial health profile with a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, indicating borderline stability, and no available Altman Z-Score prevents a full distress risk assessment. Despite a low Price/Sales ratio of 0.28 suggesting potential undervaluation, the company is unprofitable with negative earnings, a negative ROE of -47.48%, and deteriorating profitability metrics. While recent quarterly earnings have frequently beaten extremely low expectations—sometimes by over 1000%—this reflects poor baselines rather than sustainable progress, and long-term price performance remains deeply negative with a 5-year return of -93.9%. The stock trades significantly below analyst target prices, but fundamental weaknesses, lack of profitability, and inconsistent cash flow data undermine bullish sentiment.

Strengths
Frequent earnings beats with an average surprise of over 300% in recent quarters, signaling possible operational improvements or aggressive cost management
Low Price/Sales ratio of 0.28 suggests potential undervaluation relative to revenue, especially compared to sector average of 11.6% revenue growth
Gross margin of 36.33% is healthy for the Packaged Foods industry, indicating pricing power or efficient production
Risks
Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicates weak financial health, particularly concerning for a company with negative earnings and ROE
No Altman Z-Score available prevents proper bankruptcy risk evaluation, a critical gap for a loss-making firm
Negative profit margin (-2.86%) and ROE (-47.48%) reflect ongoing unprofitability and poor capital efficiency

Compare Another Pair

ACU vs BRCC: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Acme United Corporation (ACU) and BRC Inc. (BRCC) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile