No connection

Search Results

ACU vs PG

ACU
Acme United Corporation
NEUTRAL
Price
$43.48
Market Cap
$165.6M
Sector
Consumer Defensive
AI Confidence
85%
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
BEARISH
Price
$145.71
Market Cap
$340.49B
Sector
Consumer Defensive
AI Confidence
85%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
ACU
18.74
PG
21.59
Forward P/E
ACU
19.41
PG
20.23
P/B Ratio
ACU
1.41
PG
6.48
P/S Ratio
ACU
0.84
PG
3.99
EV/EBITDA
ACU
9.42
PG
14.76

Profitability

Gross Margin
ACU
39.39%
PG
51.19%
Operating Margin
ACU
6.1%
PG
26.3%
Profit Margin
ACU
5.18%
PG
19.3%
ROE
ACU
9.07%
PG
31.56%
ROA
ACU
5.52%
PG
10.9%

Growth

Revenue Growth
ACU
3.4%
PG
1.5%
Earnings Growth
ACU
9.4%
PG
-5.4%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
ACU
0.24
PG
0.69
Current Ratio
ACU
4.21
PG
0.72
Quick Ratio
ACU
1.43
PG
0.47

Dividends

Dividend Yield
ACU
1.41%
PG
2.92%
Payout Ratio
ACU
25.3%
PG
61.88%

AI Verdict

ACU NEUTRAL

ACU presents a dichotomy between a rock-solid balance sheet and deteriorating short-term operational momentum. The Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicates stable but mediocre financial health, while the absence of an Altman Z-Score is offset by an exceptionally low Debt/Equity ratio (0.24) and a high Current Ratio (4.21). While the stock is fairly valued—trading between its Graham Number ($40.16) and Intrinsic Value ($48.95)—the recent Q/Q EPS collapse of -47.8% and a bearish technical trend (0/100) suggest significant near-term headwinds.

Strengths
Exceptional liquidity with a Current Ratio of 4.21
Very low leverage (Debt/Equity of 0.24)
Conservative dividend payout ratio (25.30%)
Risks
Severe recent earnings contraction (-47.8% Q/Q EPS growth)
Bearish technical trend (0/100 score)
Low Piotroski F-Score (4/9) indicating stagnant operational efficiency
PG BEARISH

PG exhibits a stable financial foundation with a Piotroski F-Score of 6/9, but it is severely overvalued relative to its deterministic baselines. The current price of $145.71 represents a massive premium over the Graham Number ($58.45) and Intrinsic Value ($47.25), while a PEG ratio of 3.92 indicates the valuation is disconnected from its stagnant growth. Negative earnings growth (-5.40% YoY) combined with bearish insider activity and a 0/100 technical trend suggests significant downside risk despite the company's operational efficiency.

Strengths
Exceptional Return on Equity (ROE) of 31.56%
Strong gross margins (51.19%) and operating margins (26.30%)
Consistent track record of beating earnings estimates over 25 quarters
Risks
Extreme valuation premium over Graham and Intrinsic value estimates
Negative earnings growth (-5.40% YoY and -6.70% Q/Q)
Weak liquidity ratios with a Current Ratio of 0.72 and Quick Ratio of 0.47

Compare Another Pair

ACU vs PG: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Acme United Corporation (ACU) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile