AER vs CW
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
AER's Advanced Deterministic Scorecard shows a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, indicating stable but not strong financial health, while the absence of an Altman Z-Score prevents a full distress risk assessment. The stock trades at a significant discount to its growth-based intrinsic value of $621.86, yet well above the conservative Graham Number of $227.61, suggesting high growth expectations are priced in. Exceptional profitability metrics—such as a 61.58% operating margin and 21.71% ROE—contrast with a high debt/equity ratio of 2.43 and weak technical trend. Strong earnings growth and consistent analyst estimate beats support upside potential, but leverage and deteriorating technicals cap bullishness.
Curtiss-Wright exhibits exceptional operational health with a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 and a flawless 25-quarter earnings beat record. However, the company is severely overvalued, trading at $717.53—nearly double its growth-based intrinsic value of $378.78 and far exceeding its Graham Number of $140.92. While the fundamental quality is top-tier, the combination of a high P/E (55.88), bearish insider selling by the CEO and CFO, and a weak technical trend (10/100) suggests significant downside risk or a period of stagnation.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
AER vs CW: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares AerCap Holdings N.V. (AER) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.