AFYA vs COST
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
AFYA's Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicates a borderline stable financial health, falling short of strong fundamentals. The absence of an Altman Z-Score raises concern about default risk, especially given a current ratio of 0.98 and quick ratio of 0.95, suggesting liquidity pressure. Despite this, the company exhibits strong profitability with a 20.08% net margin and 29.88% operating margin, and delivers robust earnings growth of 29.8% YoY. The stock trades at a significant discount to its intrinsic value of $45.43 and Graham Number of $18.59, implying undervaluation, though technicals are bearish and analyst sentiment is underperform. The dividend is sustainable with a low payout ratio of 16.73%, but the 4.82% yield may not compensate for the lack of momentum.
COST shows neutral fundamentals based on deterministic rules. Financial strength is stable (F-Score 4/9). Mixed signals with both opportunities and risks present.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
AFYA vs COST: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Afya Limited (AFYA) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.