AGNC vs LAMR
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
AGNC exhibits severe financial health concerns, as evidenced by a Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 (indicating weak fundamentals) and a missing Altman Z-Score, which raises unquantified distress risk. Despite a high intrinsic value estimate of $43.37 and a Graham Number of $17.64, the stock trades at $10.23, suggesting a potential undervaluation—however, this is undermined by extreme leverage (Debt/Equity: 6.89), near-zero liquidity (Current Ratio: 0.18), and a 97.96% payout ratio. The recent insider selling of $11.43M over six months signals strong bearish sentiment, while earnings have consistently missed expectations in the last four quarters. The 52-week range of $7.85–$12.19 reflects high volatility and lack of sustained momentum.
LAMR exhibits significant valuation misalignment, trading at a massive premium to its Graham Number ($35.97) and Intrinsic Value ($40.32). While the Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicates stable health, the financial profile is marred by a dangerous payout ratio of 107.45% and a low current ratio of 0.58. Consistent earnings misses (0/4 in the last year) combined with a bearish technical trend (10/100) and insider selling suggest a lack of fundamental support for the current price level.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
AGNC vs LAMR: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) and Lamar Advertising Company (LAMR) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.