No connection

Search Results

AKA vs BABA

AKA
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.
BEARISH
Price
$12.27
Market Cap
$133.1M
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
78%
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
NEUTRAL
Price
$173.23
Market Cap
$413.56B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
65%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
AKA
--
BABA
23.6
Forward P/E
AKA
-7.23
BABA
19.5
P/B Ratio
AKA
1.19
BABA
2.71
P/S Ratio
AKA
0.22
BABA
0.41
EV/EBITDA
AKA
28.68
BABA
20.1

Profitability

Gross Margin
AKA
57.44%
BABA
41.17%
Operating Margin
AKA
-0.82%
BABA
2.17%
Profit Margin
AKA
-4.42%
BABA
12.19%
ROE
AKA
-21.29%
BABA
11.19%
ROA
AKA
-1.03%
BABA
4.03%

Growth

Revenue Growth
AKA
-1.9%
BABA
4.8%
Earnings Growth
AKA
--
BABA
-51.8%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
AKA
1.91
BABA
0.27
Current Ratio
AKA
1.35
BABA
1.46
Quick Ratio
AKA
0.29
BABA
0.84

Dividends

Dividend Yield
AKA
--
BABA
0.59%
Payout Ratio
AKA
0.0%
BABA
14.4%

AI Verdict

AKA BEARISH

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a weak financial health profile with a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, indicating borderline stability, and a lack of Altman Z-Score raises concerns about bankruptcy risk assessment. Despite a low Price/Sales ratio of 0.22 suggesting potential undervaluation, the company is unprofitable with negative earnings, declining revenue, and deteriorating ROE of -21.29%. Insider selling, a bearish technical trend, and deeply negative long-term price performance (-89.8% over 5Y) further undermine confidence. While analysts recommend a 'buy' with a $19.75 target, the fundamental and cash flow weaknesses present substantial risks.

Strengths
Gross margin remains strong at 57.44%, indicating pricing power or efficient cost control in core operations
Price/Sales ratio of 0.22 is significantly below sector average, suggesting potential undervaluation
Recent quarterly earnings surprises have been positive in 3 of the last 4 quarters, showing improving execution
Risks
Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicates weak financial health with risks in profitability and leverage
Negative profit and operating margins (-4.42%, -0.82%) show ongoing unprofitability
High debt/equity ratio of 1.91 increases financial risk and limits flexibility
BABA NEUTRAL

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a mixed financial profile for Alibaba (BABA), with a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicating suboptimal financial health, and no available Altman Z-Score limiting distress risk assessment. While valuation metrics appear favorable relative to peers—especially a Price/Sales of 0.41 and Forward P/E of 19.50—earnings growth is sharply negative (YoY EPS down 71%), and recent quarterly beats have reversed into consistent misses over the last four quarters. Strong insider sentiment and a bullish analyst consensus (strong_buy) contrast with deteriorating profitability and weak technical trends (10/100). The stock trades significantly above the Graham Number ($102.68) and intrinsic value estimate ($51.38), suggesting overvaluation unless growth rebounds materially.

Strengths
Attractive valuation multiples relative to sector: P/E (23.60) and Price/Sales (0.41) well below sector averages (Avg P/E: 49.05, Avg P/S: N/A but implied high)
Low debt burden with Debt/Equity of 0.27, well below sector average of 1.63, providing financial flexibility
Strong gross margin of 41.17%, reflecting pricing power and operational efficiency in core e-commerce
Risks
Weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals deteriorating financial health—penalizes health score per instructions
Earnings in freefall: YoY EPS growth down 71.0%, Q/Q down 70.4%, with last four quarters missing estimates by an average of -10.5%
Operating margin collapsed to 2.17%, indicating severe pressure in profitability despite stable gross margins

Compare Another Pair

AKA vs BABA: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (AKA) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile