ALRM vs NVDA
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
ALRM's Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicates weak financial health, signaling potential instability despite moderate profitability and growth. The absence of an Altman Z-Score raises concern about default risk, particularly given a high debt/equity ratio of 1.20. While the company exhibits strong earnings growth (17.9% YoY) and consistent earnings beats (average surprise of 18.19% over last 4 quarters), its valuation at 18.94x P/E is elevated relative to peers and the broader sector. The Graham Number ($30.76) and intrinsic value estimate ($72.57) suggest a significant premium to conservative fair value, driven by growth expectations. Insider selling activity over the past six months further tempers optimism.
NVDA shows bullish fundamentals based on deterministic rules. Financial strength is strong (F-Score 7/9). Key strengths include strong valuation and growth metrics. Price trades at a 20.7% premium to fair value estimate ($144.55), limiting near-term upside from a valuation perspective.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
ALRM vs NVDA: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. (ALRM) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.