ALV vs AMZN
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
Autoliv (ALV) shows mixed financial health with a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, indicating borderline stability, and no available Altman Z-Score to assess distress risk. The stock appears reasonably valued with a P/E of 13.03 below sector average, strong ROE of 31.01%, and solid earnings growth of 31% YoY, but faces concerns around liquidity (Current Ratio: 0.95) and technical weakness (Technical Trend: 10/100). Dividend strength is moderate at 50/100 with a sustainable 2.48% yield, while analyst consensus leans positive with a $138.72 target price. However, insider sentiment is lukewarm and recent price performance shows decelerating momentum despite solid long-term returns.
Amazon exhibits a stable financial foundation with a Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 and a healthy Debt/Equity ratio of 0.43. While the current price of $221.25 represents a significant premium over the Graham Number ($79.92) and Intrinsic Value ($107.45), this is typical for a high-growth dominant player in the internet retail and cloud space. Strong revenue growth (13.6%) and a superior ROE (22.29%) compared to the sector average (4.42%) justify the valuation premium. Despite bearish insider selling, the strong analyst consensus and consistent earnings beat history support a positive long-term outlook.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
ALV vs AMZN: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Autoliv, Inc. (ALV) and Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.