AMN vs AZN
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
The company exhibits severe financial distress with a Piotroski F-Score of just 2/9, indicating weak fundamental health. Despite recent earnings surprises and short-term EPS growth, the business is unprofitable (negative profit margin and ROE), leveraged (Debt/Equity of 1.37), and has declining revenues. Valuation metrics like a high Forward P/E of 30.31 and low Price/Sales of 0.29 reflect inconsistent pricing signals, while the stock has lost over 70% of its value in the past five years. The absence of an Altman Z-Score due to insufficient data further raises concerns about financial stability.
AstraZeneca's deterministic health score is concerning with a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, indicating marginal financial stability. While profitability metrics like ROE (21.67%) and gross margin (83.26%) are strong, the current price of $92.95 trades significantly above the Graham Number of $45.06, reflecting high growth expectations. Revenue and earnings growth are robust (12% and 78% YoY, respectively), but recent earnings surprises have been volatile, including a -25.9% miss in Q3 2025. Analysts maintain a strong_buy recommendation, though insider selling and weak technical trends (10/100) suggest caution near-term.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
AMN vs AZN: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. (AMN) and AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.